Another week, and another 80 Iraqis are slaughtered in a marketplace bombing in Baghdad. U.S. soldiers continue to die from roadside bombs and sniper fire, and are now openly questioning their mission. Congress and a majority of Americans are clamoring for a definite timeline for withdrawing our troops. Against this bleak backdrop, said William Odom in The Washington Post, the Bush administration and its supporters are resorting to a last, desperate rationale for staying in Iraq: 'œto prevent the terrible aftermath that will occur if our forces are withdrawn.' But this is pure 'œdouble-think.' Our bungled invasion, which was supposed to turn Iraq into a stable, pro-American democracy, has already turned Iraq into a bloodbath. Iran's influence over Iraq is strong and growing. Al Qaida has established a foothold in the country, where its jihadists are getting hands-on training in killing Americans. 'œA prolonged U.S. occupation cannot prevent what already exists.'
Iraq, in fact, is no longer embroiled in just one war but four, said Phillip Carter in Slate.com. The first is an internal struggle among Shiites, especially in the south. The second is a 'œsectarian conflict, principally in Baghdad.' The third is the Sunni insurgency against the U.S. and the Iraqi government, which our continuing presence there has fueled. The fourth is being waged by al Qaida. Try telling that to this conflict's few remaining die-hard supporters, said Jonathan Chait in the Los Angeles Times. They now seem 'œcompletely detached from reality.' Vice President Dick Cheney, Sen. Joe Lieberman, and other hawks no longer want to talk about what's actually happening on the ground; instead, they're resorting to generic, gung-ho bromides: 'œTrust the commander in chief, don't undermine the troops, withdrawal equals defeat.' The defeat has already occurred; by withdrawing our troops, we might at least force the Shiite-dominated government to negotiate with the Sunnis to keep Iraq from disintegrating.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'Time-honored political tactic: Throw your wife under the bus'Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
-
Best non-alcoholic spirits for summer cocktailsThe Week Recommends As hard liquor takes a backseat for many, the ingredients for the perfect mocktail are dryly delicious
-
Will Biden's tariffs hinder China's EV dominance?Today's Big Question Climate change goals and American jobs in tension
-
Obama: Did he damage his credibility over Syria?feature With a “slip of the tongue” Secretary of State John Kerry may have not only averted war, but also saved the Obama presidency.
-
Syria: Is a ‘shot across the bow’ enough?
feature The U.S. response to Bashar al-Assad's use of sarin gas must be painful enough to serve as a true deterrent.
-
Rand Paul: What did he achieve with his filibuster?
feature The GOP senator's 13-hour talking filibuster pushed the administration to clarify its drone policy.
-
The military: Do women belong in combat?
feature Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced his decision to end the long-standing ban on female troops serving in combat roles.
-
Iraq: What was gained, what was lost
feature President Obama declared an end to the war in Iraq and welcomed home soldiers at Fort Bragg.
-
Iraq: Is it a mistake to bring home U.S. troops?
feature Iraq's stability is extremely fragile, and the possibility of renewed conflict among Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds is all too real.
-
Terrorists in court: What did the Ghailani verdict prove?
feature Al Qaida operative Ahmed Ghailani was convicted of one charge—out of a total of 285 charges—for his part in the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa.
-
The Catholic Church: A crisis of confidence
feature Was the pope complicit in covering up sexual abuse scandals when he served as a cardinal and an archbishop?