What happened
Three years after the invasion of Iraq, Congress held its most dramatic and bitter debate yet over the future of the war. Capitalizing on a burst of good news, including the death of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, House Republicans last week introduced a nonbinding resolution vowing to 'œcomplete the mission' in Iraq and opposing any 'œarbitrary date for withdrawal.' After 11 hours of speeches from more than 140 lawmakers, the resolution passed 256'“153. 'œWe in this Congress must show the same steely resolve as those men and women on United Flight 93,' said Speaker Dennis Hastert. In opposing the resolution, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said that the Iraqis had become dependent on an open-ended 'œU.S. security blanket,' and needed to be prodded into taking responsibility for security. 'œOnly the Iraqis can make a nation out of Iraq,'' Levin said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The American military death toll in Iraq rose to 2,500 last week. Two U.S. soldiers were kidnapped during an insurgent attack in Baghdad, prompting a massive search by 8,000 troops. The missing soldiers were found dead two days later, and officials said their bodies—which had to be identified through DNA—showed evidence of 'œbarbaric'' torture and desecration.
What the editorials said
Congress was overdue for a serious debate on Iraq, said USA Today. Unfortunately, this wasn't it. Instead of a wide-ranging discussion about how to define success, whether our $320 billion is being well spent, and what we can do to win international support, both parties resorted to 'œcheap political stunts' that turned our troops 'œinto political pawns.' Our troops must stay as long as 'œthere is a reasonable chance' that the insurgency can be suppressed and Iraq can be knit into a functioning democracy. They can't, however, be asked to keep fighting 'œin a hopeless battle.'
Republicans should learn some lessons from their president, said the Los Angeles Times. Lately, Bush has acknowledged that American troops need to come home as soon as possible, even as he resists setting a deadline. That effort at conciliation is a far cry from the 'œtriumphalist and partisan' tone on display in Congress. GOP legislators had better temper their rhetoric about 'œdefeatist' Democrats. 'œOtherwise, they might be welcoming more of them to Congress after the election.''
What the columnists said
The main Democratic resolution is utterly unnecessary, since Bush 'œhas said that he wants to pull out U.S. troops as fast as he can,' said Debra J. Saunders in the San Francisco Chronicle. Demanding a 'œphased withdrawal' accomplishes nothing—except to undermine our troops, and encourage an enemy that 'œbelieves America has no political backbone.'
The only debate we should be having, said Frederick W. Kagan in The Weekly Standard, is how many more troops to send to Iraq. Shoring up the government, rebuilding infrastructure, and training Iraqi police may make us feel better, but it does nothing to weaken the insurgency. Only clearing and holding cities with overwhelming force will accomplish that. When we do that, 'œwe know we've won, the Iraqi people know we've won, and the insurgents know we've won.'
Military victory looks less likely with every passing day, said Nicholas von Hoffman in The Nation. Many of our troops are on their third tour of duty, exhausted and demoralized, and as the Haditha massacre demonstrated, our forces are 'œin danger of creeping disintegration.' Savage militias and terrorists control most of the country. U.S.-sponsored construction projects have been shut down. Given another year of this, and the only exit strategy we'll be debating will be how to 'œextract our people with a minimum of loss.'
What next?
Los Angeles Times
-
How will the new Repayment Assistance Plan for student loans work?the explainer The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) will replace existing income-driven repayment plans
-
In the Spotlight Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has been at odds with US forces
-
Music reviews: Ethel Cain, Amaarae, and The Black KeysFeature "Willoughby Tucker, I'll Always Love You," "Black Star," and "No Rain, No Flowers"
-
Putin’s threat to fracture Ukrainefeature Fears that Russia was building a pretext for an invasion of eastern Ukraine grew, as pro-Kremlin protesters occupied government buildings in three cities.
-
Curbing NSA surveillance
feature The White House said it will propose a broad overhaul of the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program.
-
Downsizing the military
feature A new budget plan for the Pentagon would save hundreds of billions of dollars by taking the military off its post-9/11 war footing.
-
Putin ratchets up pressure on Ukraine
feature Russian President Vladimir Putin put 150,000 troops at the Ukraine border on high alert and cut off $15 billion in financial aid.
-
Ukraine on the brink of civil war
feature Ukraine’s capital was engulfed in flames and violence when hundreds of riot police launched an assault on an anti-government protest camp.
-
Ukraine at the breaking point
feature An alliance of opposition groups vowed protests would continue until President Viktor Yanukovych is removed from power.
-
Dim prospects for Syrian talks
feature A long-awaited Syrian peace conference in Montreux, Switzerland, quickly degenerated into a cross fire of bitter accusations.
-
The fight over jobless benefits
feature A bill to restore federal benefits for the long-term unemployed advanced when six Republican senators voted with Democrats.