What was Volkswagen thinking?
Analyzing an audacious fraud
The smartest insight and analysis, from all perspectives, rounded up from around the web:
Volkswagen's scheme to cheat on emissions tests is "shaping up as one of the great corporate scandals of the age," said Danny Hakim, Aaron Kessler, and Jack Ewing at The New York Times. The German automaker has admitted it installed sophisticated software in millions of diesel vehicles that allowed the cars to spew far more pollutants than regulations allowed; it now faces billions of dollars in fines, lawsuits from governments and consumers around the world, and a criminal investigation into ex-CEO Martin Winterkorn and other VW executives by German prosecutors. What led Volkswagen down this dark path? "Unbridled ambition." For years, VW has been on a mission to overtake Toyota as the world's largest automaker. Part of this strategy involved a big bet on diesel-powered cars, which VW pitched with a promise of "high mileage and low emissions without sacrificing performance" — a crucial selling point in winning over American drivers, who favor big, powerful cars. VW's insular corporate culture and "clannish board" also deserve their fair share of blame, said James Stewart, also at the Times. The company has for years been dominated by the Porsche and Piëch families, who rarely allow outside views to penetrate. Their often dysfunctional governance, plus "a deep-rooted hostility to environmental regulations" among the company's engineers, made a cheating scandal "all but inevitable."
"It's not just Volkswagen," said Jason Karaian at Quartz. Auto manufacturers have been cheating on emissions tests for years, though most of the dishonesty doesn't sink to the level of illegality. The International Council on Clean Transportation said this year that carbon dioxide emissions in European road tests are typically some 40 percent higher than the official amounts certified in the lab. The gap was less than 10 percent in 2001. Why the growing discrepancy? Automakers have found lots of "perfectly legal ways" to pass emissions and fuel efficiency tests, from overinflating tires on test models to taping up doors and grills to improve aerodynamics. In that wink-wink regulatory environment, what's perhaps most shocking is that VW "was brazen enough to thwart tests in the way it did." Take note, companies: "The most dangerous three-word phrase in business is 'Everyone does it,'" said John Gapper at the Financial Times. It may be conventional to bend regulations, or take cues from rivals about what you can get away with. But "when the backlash comes, it comes with a vengeance."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"We should be outraged" by VW's behavior, said Edward Queen at New Republic. "But we should not be shocked." For decades, business schools have taught that the only duty of a corporation is return on investment. When this lesson is taken as gospel, it "drives tsunamis of corporate malfeasance." I have a hard time believing that Winterkorn sanctioned this elaborate deception, "not because it was so dishonest, but because it was so risky," said Brian Dickerson in the Detroit Free Press. Others find it impossible to believe that a company as micromanaged as Volkswagen could have hatched such an "audacious fraud" without the "explicit permission, or at least the passive complicity" of executives. No matter who knew what, Volkswagen's actions demonstrate a "sick corporate culture" that values short-term profits over safety and customer satisfaction. This is one automaker that must be rebuilt "from the bottom up."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The key financial dates to prepare for in 2025
The Explainer Discover the main money milestones that may affect you in the new year
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: December 19, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 19, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The pros and cons of noncompete agreements
The Explainer The FTC wants to ban companies from binding their employees with noncompete agreements. Who would this benefit, and who would it hurt?
By Peter Weber Published
-
What experts are saying about the economy's surprise contraction
The Explainer The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The death of cities was greatly exaggerated
The Explainer Why the pandemic predictions about urban flight were wrong
By David Faris Published
-
The housing crisis is here
The Explainer As the pandemic takes its toll, renters face eviction even as buyers are bidding higher
By The Week Staff Published
-
How to be an ally to marginalized coworkers
The Explainer Show up for your colleagues by showing that you see them and their struggles
By Tonya Russell Published
-
What the stock market knows
The Explainer Publicly traded companies are going to wallop small businesses
By Noah Millman Published
-
Can the government save small businesses?
The Explainer Many are fighting for a fair share of the coronavirus rescue package
By The Week Staff Published
-
How the oil crash could turn into a much bigger economic shock
The Explainer This could be a huge problem for the entire economy
By Jeff Spross Published