Opinion

What the jobs report doesn't tell us

More jobs are great. But that doesn't really show us if Americans are better off.

No question about it, the American economy ended 2015 with a bang.

According to Friday's jobs report, we added a spectacular 292,000 jobs in December. On top of that, the gains for October and November were both revised upward — to 307,000 and 252,000, respectively — for an additional 50,000 jobs. That brings the average for the last three months to 284,000 jobs per month. Other indicators like the unemployment rate and labor force participation didn't improve, but they didn't backslide either.

But this is also a good opportunity to talk about some of the difficulties around reporting on the economy, especially when it comes to the monthly jobs numbers. Because the reports come out in an incremental trickle every month, everyone can get in the habit of comparing them to what came immediately before, instead of to a truly healthy baseline.

For instance, 292,000 more jobs is spectacular compared to the rest of 2015, but the year as a whole averaged only 221,000 jobs per month. That's actually lower than the 260,000 per month we averaged in 2014, and it's considerably lower than the jobs created year after year during the economic boom of the late 1990s.


(Graph courtesy of the Wall Street Journal.)

But even that isn't the most important context.

We really want to know about the balance of forces in the economy. If everyone who wants a job can get one, if people are regularly switching jobs because they're confident other opportunities are out there, and if employers are worried about losing employees for the same reason, then workers have bargaining power: They can turn down job offers that aren't ideal without fear. That allows them to demand higher wages, and a bigger slice of the overall income generated by the economy, which in turn brings down inequality.

Job gains all by themselves don't show that, because they don't answer the questions How many jobs gained compared to how many people want work? or How many jobs gained compared to population growth? Similarly, the unemployment rate isn't necessarily helpful here either, because it's just the percentage of the labor force that's employed. The labor force is everyone who's either got a job or has been looking for one in the last four weeks. Bad recessions can knock people out of the labor force because the situation is just so bad that they give up. In that case, even if the unemployment rate goes down — it's currently at 5 percent — there's still a big pool of unemployed people out there holding down the bargaining power of people who are working.

The economy is a system and job gains, population growth, labor force participation, the unemployment rate, etc, are all inputs to that system. If the inputs improve, that's good! But what we really want to know are the outputs. And the output that probably gives us the best overall picture of the balance of forces in the economy — and whether enough people are finding jobs to really drive up worker bargaining power — is nominal wage growth itself.

In both the late 90s boom, and the peak just before the Great Recession, year-over-year wage growth topped out at around 4 percent. Ever since the 2008 collapse, it's bounced around at a measly 2 percent. But in the last few months it began to tick up. It hit 2.5 percent in December.

That's really the best news, buried down deep at the bottom of the jobs report, under the job gains and the unemployment rate: We're still a long way from 4 percent, but we have what looks like the makings of genuine upward trend.


(Graph courtesy of FiveThirtyEight.)

The only way this could be happening is if we're not just adding more jobs, but we're actually getting closer to maxing out the economy's total capacity for jobs. The closer we get to that maximum the more bottom-up pressure we create on wages throughout the economy.

Now, the bad news is how far below fully maxing out the economy's employment capacity we still are, and how long it may still take to get there. Back at the start of 2015, the Economic Policy Institute estimated we'd need to average 246,000 jobs a month in order to return to the balance of forces we enjoyed at the peak just before the 2008 crash. And even then we wouldn't get there until the summer of 2017.

But enough gloom. We've got a long slog before us and trends can always nose-dive — this is true. But for the moment, the wage trend is looking up. And that's a good way to start 2016.

More From...

Picture of Jeff SprossJeff Spross
Read All
Shouldn't Congress be considered essential?
The Capitol building.
Opinion

Shouldn't Congress be considered essential?

Republicans literally want to work Americans to death
A factory.
Opinion

Republicans literally want to work Americans to death

The Payroll Protection Program's problems were extremely avoidable
Money on a cliff.
Feature

The Payroll Protection Program's problems were extremely avoidable

Can coronavirus bring economics back down to reality?
An expensive steak.
Opinion

Can coronavirus bring economics back down to reality?

Recommended

The daily business briefing: September 21, 2021
A Chevy Bolt
Business briefing

The daily business briefing: September 21, 2021

Xi 'forcefully' trying to get China back to Mao's economic vision
Xi Jinping stands above portrait of Mao Zedong.
the original blueprint

Xi 'forcefully' trying to get China back to Mao's economic vision

Teleworking Americans tend to greatly overestimate how many people are doing the same
off the mark

Teleworking Americans tend to greatly overestimate how many people are doing the same

The daily business briefing: September 20, 2021
People check phones in Beijing
Business briefing

The daily business briefing: September 20, 2021

Most Popular

7 cartoons about America's vaccine fights
Editorial Cartoon.
Feature

7 cartoons about America's vaccine fights

Did Theranos Lose Afghanistan?
Elizabeth Holmes and James Mattis.
Samuel Goldman

Did Theranos Lose Afghanistan?

Seven Brides for Seven Brothers star Jane Powell dies at 92
Jane Powell.
rest in peace

Seven Brides for Seven Brothers star Jane Powell dies at 92