Luring offshore corporate cash to America
Will the new tax law inspire U.S. corporations to repatriate their "vast stash" of overseas cash?
The smartest insight and analysis, from all perspectives, rounded up from around the web:
For years, companies called on Washington to lower corporate taxes so they could bring home their "vast stash" of overseas cash, said Larry Light at CBS News. U.S. corporations have an estimated $2.6 trillion parked abroad, and they've long argued that the 35 percent corporate tax rate dissuaded them from reinvesting it in the U.S. Republicans in Congress heard those concerns — and then some. Not only does the tax overhaul passed last month lower the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, it also offers companies "a particularly sweet deal" on repatriated cash: a "onetime" tax of 15.5 percent on liquid assets brought home and a tax of just 8 percent if the money is invested in real estate. Any future foreign-generated cash will be taxed at 10 percent. The Trump administration says this strategy will bring hundreds of billions of dollars home, "boosting U.S. economic growth and jobs." But a recent precedent "isn't inspiring." In 2004, when the U.S. offered a 5.25 percent tax holiday on foreign profits, companies brought home more than $300 billion, but delivered "very few jobs." Ten of the 15 largest corporate repatriators actually cut positions. The majority of the cash "went to mergers, stock buybacks, and dividends."
That may not be such a bad thing, said Lydia DePillis at CNN. Even if the corporate tax cut "channels more money into the hands of investors," conservatives argue, those gains could then be reinvested in other businesses that "need capital to expand or develop new products." Companies will be motivated to invest more, because tax cuts amplify the return on capital, "thus increasing the bang for an investor's buck." The tax overhaul also changes the overseas-profit calculus, said Douglas MacMillan at The Wall Street Journal. Firms such as Microsoft and Apple have "saved billions" by holding software rights and patents in low-tax havens such as Ireland and Singapore. Now that their foreign earnings will automatically face a 10 percent tax, it "removes some of the benefit" from the companies' offshore facilities. Whether that will be enough for them to shift holdings and operations to the U.S. "is less clear."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Actually, the new tax law could "increase incentives for companies to employ tax havens," said Tim Fernholz at Quartz. Amid the "hastily written new rules" is "a loophole" that effectively allows multinationals to avoid even the new 10 percent tax on overseas profits if they "invest in factories and routine operations" abroad. That could mean "more jobs headed out of the U.S." CEOs see the tax overhaul for what it is: "a giant permission slip for shipping profits overseas," said Dylan Matthews at Vox. After all, if your company has been stockpiling profits to avoid U.S. taxes "and then you get a special one-time tax break, that convinces you that stockpiling profits overseas is a great idea." Offering a tax holiday didn't work for U.S. workers in 2004. "As the saying goes, doing the same thing twice and expecting different results is the definition of insanity."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
7 drinks for every winter need possible
The Week Recommends Including a variety of base spirits and a range of temperatures
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
'We have made it a crime for most refugees to want the American dream'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Was the Azerbaijan Airlines plane shot down?
Today's Big Question Multiple sources claim Russian anti-aircraft missile damaged passenger jet, leading to Christmas Day crash that killed at least 38
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The pros and cons of noncompete agreements
The Explainer The FTC wants to ban companies from binding their employees with noncompete agreements. Who would this benefit, and who would it hurt?
By Peter Weber Published
-
What experts are saying about the economy's surprise contraction
The Explainer The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The death of cities was greatly exaggerated
The Explainer Why the pandemic predictions about urban flight were wrong
By David Faris Published
-
The housing crisis is here
The Explainer As the pandemic takes its toll, renters face eviction even as buyers are bidding higher
By The Week Staff Published
-
How to be an ally to marginalized coworkers
The Explainer Show up for your colleagues by showing that you see them and their struggles
By Tonya Russell Published
-
What the stock market knows
The Explainer Publicly traded companies are going to wallop small businesses
By Noah Millman Published
-
Can the government save small businesses?
The Explainer Many are fighting for a fair share of the coronavirus rescue package
By The Week Staff Published
-
How the oil crash could turn into a much bigger economic shock
The Explainer This could be a huge problem for the entire economy
By Jeff Spross Published