In praise of the worst phone on the market

It's fall, and in the tech world that means one thing: new stuff. From smartphones to computers to gadgets, new and improved devices are released this season by seemingly every manufacturer, boasting more specs, more speed, more everything.

That's what makes the new Palm phone so interesting. The newly announced device, sporting the name of the now defunct PDA maker, is a deliberately small, simple smartphone that is decidedly less. It has a tiny 3.3-inch screen; a very basic selection of apps like texting, maps, and a phone; a simple camera and ... that's it. Oh, and the Warriors' Stephen Curry is an investor and spokesperson. It's a companion phone, for when you want to leave the house without the constant distraction of your main device, but don't want to disconnect entirely.

Put another way, it's a bad phone, but on purpose. And indeed, the reaction has been just that: to call it bad. Most tech press so far has scoffed at the phone because of its inherent limitations, but also some genuinely poor choices, such as limiting it to Verizon and making it a secondary device, like a smartwatch, rather than a standalone phone.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

But maybe the Palm phone is exactly what tech needs — which is to say, less. Rather than constantly focusing on what it can add, the way forward for tech is to find a sustainable business model predicated on taking things away.

Absence, however, isn't the only interesting thing about the Palm phone. The idea of a distraction-less secondary device has been a running theme for the past couple of years. There are minimalist gadgets like the Light Phone, which let you only call or message. Then there are things like the Apple Watch, which now let you make calls or text while also tracking fitness.

The trouble with those devices, though, is that they lack something critical, like a keyboard to make texting actually viable or a camera to document the minutiae of your day. So the Palm phone's inclusion of both things, in addition to Google Maps and email, seems to strike a good balance: It gives you some of the benefits of a full smartphone, without all of its drawbacks — particularly the pull of social media.

That's not to say the criticisms of the device are completely unfair, though. The solution to tech overload is rarely more tech. And more practically, tying the Palm phone to one carrier while also forcing consumers to add it to an existing plan will likely limit its appeal significantly.

On an abstract level, there's also something about the idea of a bad phone that runs counter to everything we think we know about the tech industry. A new phone that promises fewer features and less capability? It's so vaguely "un-American" and anti-capitalist that it seems destined to fail not just on its merits, but almost on ideological grounds. "What do you mean you want to get something that is deliberately worse?" an ordinary consumer might ask.

More is tech's entire business model. How else do you entice consumers to upgrade their devices or try the newest app feature or service if not jamming ever more stuff into things? But as smartphones and computers have become central to both our personal and work lives, even tech makers themselves are noticing their deleterious effects. Apple and Google have both added features to help users limit their time on their smartphones. Facebook keeps talking about time well spent. Yet all these tech companies' financial models depend on you buying more things or spending more time on their platforms. It's a miasma of conflicting interests.

Where we end up is a product like the Palm phone: an interesting anomaly in the tech landscape, likely doomed to be unsuccessful, all the while meeting a need that no one else is. Meanwhile, there's increasing evidence supporting the case for less tech. As but one example, boredom appears to be good for creativity — that is, simply not doing something can actually be better than doing anything at all.

It's precisely that counterintuitive inversion that tech needs more of. From design principles in software, to how hardware gets updated and created, tech needs to respond to its effects on the world by embracing limitation, constraint — even frustration.

The Palm phone is terrible. Isn't that great?