M. Night Shyamalan's Glass is better than you've heard
M. Night Shyamalan's new superhero movie Glass is getting pummeled by critics. It's "one big anti-climax” (per The Associated Press), "stupefying and a little sad” (yikes, Time Out) and, most chilling, "the Life Itself of superhero movies” (ouch, IndieWire). It's hovering around a dismal 35 percent score on Rotten Tomatoes, not far off from some of the director's past blunders.
But here's a Shyamalan twist: Glass is actually pretty good.
Okay, okay — it is less surefooted than Shyamalan's best work. But this is in part because the movie has a lot of narrative weight to carry, being based both on Shyamalan's 2016 horror hit Split and — twist! — Unbreakable, a superhero picture he made nearly 20 years ago. Glass opens with Unbreakable's superman, David Dunn (Bruce Willis), on the trail of Split's Horde (James McAvoy), a disturbed man possessed by one of his many personalities, a man-beast with superhuman physicality. Eventually both men wind up in a mental hospital alongside an apparently catatonic Mr. Glass (Samuel L. Jackson), David's brittle-boned, comics-obsessed, self-styled nemesis. A therapist (Sarah Paulson), has just a few days to "cure" them of their supposed delusions before David and the Horde are remanded into police custody. The movie follows their sessions, and also keeps tabs on Casey (Anya Taylor-Joy) and David's son Joseph (still played by Unbreakable's Spencer Treat Clark) as they react to the news that these men have been apprehended.
Casey and Joseph may seem extraneous, especially for fans who came to see a showdown between Willis, Jackson, and McAvoy (a surfeit of characters is one of the few things Glass has in common with a bigger superhero bash like Avengers: Infinity War). But their inclusion speaks to why Shyamalan remains such a compelling artist. In Glass, as in its predecessors, several non-superpowered characters are as important as the heroes and villains. Casey has been victimized by the Horde, but that doesn't erase her empathy for the suffering within the beast; Joseph clearly idolizes his father, but doesn't aspire to imitate him; he just wants to help him and provide a human voice of reason. Everyone in this movie is wounded in some way and searching for their place in the world. Shyamalan is great at bringing out the vulnerability in his actors: The stoic Willis will suddenly show uncertainty, and even McAvoy's persona-switching bravado (often darkly funny) can give way to a sense of hurt.
This doesn't mean the movie is the self-serious slog some viewers are describing. While Shyamalan betrays little interest in contemporary comic-book culture or the proliferation of superhero movies — a fact plenty of critics have taken issue with — he visualizes his material with the style of a good comic artist. Glass is not an action movie by any stretch, but when characters fight, Shyamalan doesn't shoot the conflicts to show off elaborate choreography or special effects. (Willis may not even be the one doing the fighting, some have sniffed, as if the actor has a long history of stunning on-screen fight scenes.) Often the director breaks the sequences down into clear, striking images that look more like traditional comic-book panels than any number of modern superhero spectaculars. One skirmish, for example, happens entirely in the background of the frame, with another character occupying the foreground, a major show of visual confidence. Elsewhere, his point-of-view shots and color coding recreate the close visual guidance that a good comic book provides its readers.
Of course, most of Shyamalan's movies look good. Fewer of them sound good. Yet Glass' sometimes-goofy philosophizing gives the movie a distinct point of view, binding the story together even as it must divvy up screentime. Glass may be overstuffed, but it rarely feels rushed, because Shyamalan's camera holds such a steady gaze, more interested in his characters' feelings than their physical grappling.
The movie even sets up a slam-bang climax before pointedly scaling it back down in a way that clearly tests the patience of some of his fans. But after years of climactic garbage-swirl superhero bombast, I found it refreshing, not disappointing. It's more disappointing to see a movie both this odd and this elegantly shot being dismissed as dull.
Glass isn't as beguilingly melancholic or original as Unbreakable — and given recent genre peaks like Black Panther, Wonder Woman, and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, Shyamalan has arguably fallen behind the superhero-movie curve he once had beat. But true to his movie's philosophizing, he's done so by staying true to his idiosyncrasies and abilities. With its many characters alternately showcased and neglected, Glass is a strange movie. In its haunted, haunting way, it's also a satisfying one.