Google finds it's been underpaying men
The smartest insight and analysis on Google's surprising study, rounded up from around the web
The smartest insight and analysis, from all perspectives, rounded up from around the web:
A survey of salaries at Google revealed a surprising result: "Men were being paid less money than women for doing similar work," said Daisuke Wakabayashi at The New York Times. Google managers can adjust pay based on a subjective assessment of whether an employee's pay is in line with "peers who make similar contributions." Though the company has been accused of bias against women in the past, Google's 2018 analysis found that in these judgments managers actually tilted too far in the other direction. To remedy that, Google gave $9.7 million in additional pay to more than 10,000 employees. Google's hasn't provided precise numbers but did disclose that men, who make up 69 percent of the company's workforce, got an even higher proportion of the money.
Sharing this "counterintuitive" statistic only serves to undermine the complaints of thousands of women, said April Glaser at Slate. Google faces a lawsuit from women who say that female engineers "hired with the same experience as men are given lower positions at the company." It's hard to know exactly what's happening at Google, said Bryce Covert at The New York Times, because the company won't release all its data. But a federal judge recently cleared the way for U.S. regulators to begin requiring companies with 100 or more employees to report information on pay by gender and race. In Britain, a similar rule forced Google "to cough up the fact that in 2017 its female British employees on average earned 17 percent less per hour" than men.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Google's study should be seen as a good sign for women's progress in tech, said Elizabeth Nolan Brown at Reason. Instead, the professional gender-equality lobby is "insisting that the study only masks much deeper discrimination." If women are still facing discrimination related to leveling, that's an issue worth reviewing. But activists have spread misinformation about the wage gap for years while lumping together every category of job. Now, when the data hasn't showed what they hoped for, they are "arguing for more nuance."
Women have actually been making gains relative to men in "cognitive/high-wage occupations," said Justin Fox at Bloomberg. The reason? Women have better social skills than men, and social skills are growing in influence in those jobs. It's what has made girls historically better than boys at school. Women have outpaced men in attaining their college degrees since the 1980s. "The consequences are still playing out." In politics, "the Republican Party's strongest base of support is now among non- college-educated white men." And the advantages that propelled girls past boys in school are now growing in value in the labor market. "That's reason enough to think that the earnings gender gap will keep shrinking."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The ultimate films of 2024 by genre
From the Magazine In a year dominated by sequels, here are the releases that impressed the critics, from Hollywoodgate and Twisters to Poor Things and Atomic People
By The Week UK Published
-
The big art stories of 2024
In depth From the rediscovery of a long-lost painting and the year's highest sale price to the artwork eaten by its new owner
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: December 29, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
The pros and cons of noncompete agreements
The Explainer The FTC wants to ban companies from binding their employees with noncompete agreements. Who would this benefit, and who would it hurt?
By Peter Weber Published
-
What experts are saying about the economy's surprise contraction
The Explainer The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The death of cities was greatly exaggerated
The Explainer Why the pandemic predictions about urban flight were wrong
By David Faris Published
-
The housing crisis is here
The Explainer As the pandemic takes its toll, renters face eviction even as buyers are bidding higher
By The Week Staff Published
-
How to be an ally to marginalized coworkers
The Explainer Show up for your colleagues by showing that you see them and their struggles
By Tonya Russell Published
-
What the stock market knows
The Explainer Publicly traded companies are going to wallop small businesses
By Noah Millman Published
-
Can the government save small businesses?
The Explainer Many are fighting for a fair share of the coronavirus rescue package
By The Week Staff Published
-
How the oil crash could turn into a much bigger economic shock
The Explainer This could be a huge problem for the entire economy
By Jeff Spross Published