Amazon has reportedly scrapped a recruitment tool powered by artificial intelligence (AI) that showed a clear bias against women.
“Everyone wanted this holy grail”, one of the sources said. The system was designed to sift through 100 job applications and “spit out” the top five results.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The machine gave each applicant a rating out of five, “much like shoppers rate products on Amazon”, says the news site.
The AI was trained to use a method known as machine learning. This allowed researchers to feed the program old CVs from the past ten years to use as reference material so the AI could accurately grade real-life job applications, the BBC says.
But the data submitted came primarily from former male applicants, meaning the “sexist” AI taught itself that “male candidates were preferable”, the broadcaster reports.
The bias was discovered in 2015 when recruiters found that the AI system wasn’t rating applicants in a gender-neutral way. The program was penalising CVs with the word “women” in them, putting female applicants who had studied at women’s colleges, for example, or written “women’s chess club captain” in their list of achievements at a disadvantage.
Programmers subsequently amended the system to remove the bias but this was not a complete success, according to Fortune. The AI was abandoned last year.
Amazon declined to comment on the technology, but said the tool “was never used by Amazon recruiters to evaluate candidates.”
Has the AI hindered female job applicants?
Amazon insiders insist it hasn’t.
Speaking to The Sun, Amazon sources said the retail giant “never based recruitment decisions on the tool's ratings alone”, but recruiters did examine the AI’s recommendations when sifting through applications.
This isn’t the first time an AI programme has been shown to favour men over women.
Facebook came under fire last month after it emerged that AI systems had been preventing women from seeing certain job advertisements, the newspaper says.
-
AI agents: When bots browse the webfeature Letting robots do the shopping
-
Will Chuck Schumer keep his job?Today's Big Question Democrats are discontented and pointing a finger at the Senate leader
-
Dick Cheney: the vice president who led the War on Terrorfeature Cheney died this month at the age of 84
-
AI agents: When bots browse the web
feature Letting robots do the shopping
-
Is AI to blame for recent job cuts?Today’s Big Question Numerous companies have called out AI for being the reason for the culling
-
‘Deskilling’: a dangerous side effect of AI useThe explainer Workers are increasingly reliant on the new technology
-
AI models may be developing a ‘survival drive’Under the radar Chatbots are refusing to shut down
-
Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States
-
How the online world relies on AWS cloud serversThe Explainer Chaos caused by Monday’s online outage shows that ‘when AWS sneezes, half the internet catches the flu’
-
AI is making houses more expensiveUnder the radar Homebuying is also made trickier by AI-generated internet listings
-
‘How can I know these words originated in their heart and not some data center in northern Virginia?’instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
