Democrats aren't giving up on protecting voting rights, but their options are pretty limited


Democratic leaders vowed to continue pushing for federal legislation to protect and expand voting rights after Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked debate on the For the People Act, the sweeping elections package Democrats have prioritized. "In the fight for voting rights, this vote was the starting gun, not the finish line," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said after the GOP filibustered the bill. The White House said President Biden views ensuring voting access the "fight of his presidency."
But "Democrats are boxed in on their party's signature election reform plan," and "at the moment, the party doesn't have a backup plan on elections" or a path to change the filibuster, Politico reports. Both parties managed to keep their caucuses unified in Tuesday's 50-50 Senate vote, and Republicans have made it pretty clear they are not interested in a federal remedy to the voting restrictions GOP state legislatures are putting in place on the pretextual rationale that Republican voters are concerned about election security after Biden's 2020 victory.
"Discussions are ongoing among congressional Democrats on how to proceed," The Associated Press reports, including changing the filibuster. One possibility is exempting bills on elections and voting, making 41 senators from the minority party to show up to block legislation, and returning to the "talking" filibuster.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said she will holding hearing to focus attention on some of the more than 30 restrictive voting laws that 18 GOP-led states have enacted since the 2020 election, according to the Voting Rights Lab. Democrats are also considering breaking up the legislation into popular chunks and forcing a vote on those narrower bills, and trying to enact some of their measures through party-line budget reconciliation.
Some Democrats are also more hopeful about the prospects for the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, expected to be ready in the fall. One Senate Republican, Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), has already endorsed that bill, which would restore federal oversight of state voting legislation to ensure it isn't racially discriminatory.
The John Lewis Act "faces an uphill battle in securing enough Republican votes for passage," election law scholar Richard Pildes writes in a New York Times op-ed Wednesday. "But because it is the only legislation with any bipartisan support so far, it might be the most plausible route for now to bolster national voting-rights policy — and to help bring greater legitimacy to our election process."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
5 bunker-busting cartoons about the Israel-Iran war
Cartoons Political cartoonists take on Iran waiting for Pete Hegseth to leak war plans and Donald Trump's wish for a Nobel prize
-
Malaysia's delicious food and glorious beaches
The Week Recommends From 'colourful' George Town to the 'jungled interior' of Langkawi, Malaysia is incredibly diverse
-
Is the US sliding into autocracy?
Talking Point Donald Trump's use of federal troops on home ground, dismissal of dissent and 'braggadocious' military posturing are all symptoms of a shifting political culture
-
Why are lobbyists trying to kill Trump's 'revenge tax'?
Today's Big Question Analysts say it would deter foreign investment
-
Trump's LA deployment in limbo after court rulings
Speed Read Judge Breyer ruled that Trump's National Guard deployment to Los Angeles was an 'illegal' overreach. But a federal appellate court halted the ruling.
-
Marines, National Guard in LA can detain Americans
speed read The troops have been authorized to detain anyone who interferes with immigration raids
-
Trump vows 'very big force' against parade protesters
Speed Read The parade, which will shut down much of the capital, will celebrate the US Army's 250th anniversary and Trump's 79th birthday
-
Smithsonian asserts its autonomy from Trump
speed read The DC institution defied Trump's firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet
-
Trump sends Marines to LA, backs Newsom arrest
speed read California Gov. Gavin Newsom is filing lawsuits in response to Trump's escalation of the federal response to ICE protests
-
Trump foists National Guard on unwilling California
speed read Protests erupted over ICE immigration raids in LA county
-
Supreme Court lowers bar in discrimination cases
speed read The court ruled in favor of a white woman who claimed she lost two deserved promotions to gay employees