The filibuster changes Senate Democrats are actually considering
President Biden will speak Tuesday to align himself with Senate Democrats and endorse altering chamber rules to advance important voting rights legislation, The Associated Press reports. But what exactly do upper chamber Democrats want, and what rules changes are they talking about?
At the moment, Senate Democrats aren't looking to completely eliminate the 60-vote threshold — also known as the filibuster — that's required to pass most legislation, Politico reports. Rather, they're mulling voting along party lines to change chamber rules, a process known as going "nuclear," to pass election and voting reform bills. In a 50-50 Senate, however, Democrats will need every members' vote for any tweaks to succeed.
As one option, Democrats have discussed a return to a "talking filibuster," under which a senator from the minority party can talk for as long as they want to block a bill, Politico writes. Debate continues until 60 senators vote for it to end (similar to current rules), or the minority party "leaves a vacancy on the floor — at which point the majority party can move to final passage of the bill, requiring only a simple majority vote."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Democrats are also considering lowering the required votes to start debate on a bill from 60 to 50, which could be done in conjunction with the talking filibuster, notes Politico.
Additionally, though unlikely, the party has discussed implementing a filibuster "carveout" allowing a one-time exception to pass voting legislation with a simple majority, as well as altering the number of senators needed to end a filibuster from 60 to three-fifths of those actually voting that day.
"In other words," explains Politico, "if 80 senators show up for a specific vote, the Senate would only need 48 members to vote to end a filibuster instead of 60."
Another option considers requiring 41 minority party votes to continue filibustering, or else debate would automatically end.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Starbucks workers are planning their ‘biggest strike’ everThe Explainer The union said 92% of its members voted to strike
-
‘These wouldn’t be playgrounds for billionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The 5 best nuclear war movies of all timeThe Week Recommends ‘A House of Dynamite’ reanimates a dormant cinematic genre for our new age of atomic insecurity
-
The longest US government shutdown in historyThe Explainer Federal employees and low-income households have been particularly affected by ‘partisan standoffs’ in Washington
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Is Mike Johnson rendering the House ‘irrelevant’?Talking Points Speaker has put the House on indefinite hiatus
-
Senate votes to kill Trump’s Brazil tariffSpeed Read Five Senate Republicans joined the Democrats in rebuking Trump’s import tax
-
Border Patrol gets scrutiny in court, gains power in ICESpeed Read Half of the new ICE directors are reportedly from DHS’s more aggressive Customs and Border Protection branch
-
Shutdown stalemate nears key pain pointsSpeed Read A federal employee union called for the Democrats to to stand down four weeks into the government standoff
-
Trump vows new tariffs on Canada over Reagan adspeed read The ad that offended the president has Ronald Reagan explaining why import taxes hurt the economy
-
NY attorney general asks public for ICE raid footageSpeed Read Rep. Dan Goldman claims ICE wrongly detained four US citizens in the Canal Street raid and held them for a whole day without charges
