Special Counsel John Durham accuses a key Steele dossier source of lying to the FBI
An indictment handed down Thursday by Special Counsel John Durham's office accuses Igor Danchenko, a "primary sub-source" for British former intelligence agent Christopher Steele's Trump-Russia dossier, of lying to the FBI about where and how he got information included in the report.
Danchenko appeared briefly in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday, where his lawyer tried to enter a not guilty plea to the five charges of making false statements. "The judge did not accept the plea because the hearing was not an arraignment, and Danchenko was released," The Washington Post reports.
Danchenko, a 43-year-old Russian-born U.S. analyst, voluntarily sat down with the FBI several times in 2017 as agents tried to chase down information in the Steele dossier. Durham's indictment alleges that Danchenko, among other things, did not disclose that some of his information came from a U.S. public relations executive with sources in Russia but also longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Danchenko's alleged lies matter, the indictment says, because the FBI "devoted substantial resources attempting to investigate and corroborate" the dossier's allegations and "relied in large part" on that research to obtain a surveillance warrant for Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page. Steele recently told ABC News he stands by most of the dossier.
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller did not use the Steele dossier in his two-year investigation, which uncovered a concerted effort by the Kremlin to help former President Donald Trump's campaign.
This is Durhams's third indictment in his two and a half years investigating the origin of the Trump-Russia investigation. Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty in 2020 to altering an email and was given probation, and cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, charged in September with lying to the FBI, has pleaded not guilty.
"Lying to the FBI is a significant, significant crime," Peter Strozk, the former FBI agent who helped lead the initial Trump-Russia investigation, told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Thursday night. "It's a crime if the national security adviser does it, it's a crime if, as alleged, Mr. Danchenko did that." But Clinesmith, Sussmann, and Danchenko, he said, "were all involved in matters that were very almost peripheral to the core of what we were looking at with regard to the Russia investigations."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Durham's investigation has lasted six months longer than Mueller's and uncovered almost nothing, Strozk said. But his indictments do all include "subtle sort of one-sided portrayals of the facts" that, apparently intentionally, feed the false narrative pushed by Trump and his allies that "the entire effort of what the FBI and Special Counsel Mueller did" was "all nonsense."
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Australia’s teens brace for social media banIn The Spotlight Under-16s will be banned from having accounts on major platforms
-
Labour’s dilemma on workers’ rightsThe Explainer TUC says Employment Rights Bill is ‘essential to better quality, more secure jobs’ but critics warn of impact on economic growth
-
Coaches’ salary buyouts are generating questions for collegesUnder the Radar ‘The math doesn’t seem to math,’ one expert said
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
-
The powerful names in the Epstein emailsIn Depth People from a former Harvard president to a noted linguist were mentioned
-
Honduras votes amid Trump push, pardon vowspeed read President Trump said he will pardon former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who is serving 45 years for drug trafficking
-
Congress seeks answers in ‘kill everybody’ strike reportSpeed Read Lawmakers suggest the Trump administration’s follow-up boat strike may be a war crime
-
Andriy Yermak: how weak is Zelenskyy without his right-hand man?Today's Big Question Resignation of Ukrainian president’s closest ally marks his ‘most politically perilous moment yet’
-
The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?Talking Point With the Saudis investing $1 trillion into the US, and Trump granting them ‘major non-Nato ally’ status, for now the two countries need each other
-
Could Trump run for a third term?The Explainer Constitutional amendment limits US presidents to two terms, but Trump diehards claim there is a loophole
