Congress seeks answers in ‘kill everybody’ strike report
Lawmakers suggest the Trump administration’s follow-up boat strike may be a war crime
What happened
Lawmakers with oversight of the Pentagon Sunday voiced concerns about reports that the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s first lethal strike on suspected drug-trafficking boats, saying such a follow-up attack would be illegal if not a war crime.
The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack ordered the second strike to comply with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s spoken directive “to kill everybody,” The Washington Post reported on Friday, citing two people with direct knowledge of the operation.
Who said what
Hegseth did not deny giving the “kill everybody” order. But in a social media post Friday, he called the Post’s report “fabricated, inflammatory and derogatory,” said the boat attacks were “designed to be ‘lethal, kinetic strikes,’” and insisted America’s “current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law.”
Law-of-war experts say Trump’s broader drug boat campaign is “unlawful and may expose those most directly involved to prosecution because the alleged traffickers pose no imminent threat of attack against the United States and are not in an ‘armed conflict’ with the U.S.,” the Post said. But even if traffickers were at war with the U.S., killing survivors of a boat strike amounts to “war crimes, murder or both,” a group of former military lawyers and senior leaders said Saturday. “There are no other options.”
The top Republicans and Democrats on the House and Senate armed services committees said they would ramp up oversight of the boat strikes in light of the new allegations. “Obviously, if that occurred, that would be very serious and I agree that that would be an illegal act,” House Armed Services Committee chair Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said it “rises to the level of a war crime if it’s true.” Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) told NBC’s “Meet the Press” he did not think Hegseth “would be foolish enough” to commit such a “clear violation of the law of war.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What next?
President Donald Trump Sunday night told reporters that his administration “will look into” the matter, but “Pete said he did not order the death of those two men,” and “I believe him, 100%.” Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said on “Meet the Press” that the Senate Armed Services Committee would “put these people under oath and we’re going to find out what happened.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Political cartoons for December 21Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include Christmas movies, AI sermons, and more
-
A luxury walking tour in Western AustraliaThe Week Recommends Walk through an ‘ancient forest’ and listen to the ‘gentle hushing’ of the upper canopy
-
What Nick Fuentes and the Groypers wantThe Explainer White supremacism has a new face in the US: a clean-cut 27-year-old with a vast social media following
-
What Nick Fuentes and the Groypers wantThe Explainer White supremacism has a new face in the US: a clean-cut 27-year-old with a vast social media following
-
Trump HHS moves to end care for trans youthSpeed Read The administration is making sweeping proposals that would eliminate gender-affirming care for Americans under age 18
-
Why does Trump want to reclassify marijuana?Today's Big Question Nearly two-thirds of Americans want legalization
-
Jack Smith tells House of ‘proof’ of Trump’s crimesSpeed Read President Donald Trump ‘engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election,’ hoarded classified documents and ‘repeatedly tried to obstruct justice’
-
House GOP revolt forces vote on ACA subsidiesSpeed Read The new health care bill would lower some costs but not extend expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies
-
Why does White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles have MAGA in a panic?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Trump’s all-powerful gatekeeper is at the center of a MAGA firestorm that could shift the trajectory of the administration
-
Hegseth rejects release of full boat strike footageSpeed Read There are calls to release video of the military killing two survivors of a Sept. 2 missile strike on an alleged drug trafficking boat
-
‘It’s another clarifying moment in our age of moral collapse’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
