Announcing his resignation this morning, Keir Starmer said that his party had answered the question of “whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election” and “I accept that answer with good grace”.
His plummeting popularity since Labour’s 2024 landslide electoral victory marks “one of the shortest honeymoon periods in British political history”, said the BBC’s Becky Morton and Brian Wheeler.
What did the commentators say? Shortly after becoming prime minister, Starmer boasted “that there would never be such a thing as Starmerism”, said Morton and Wheeler. But what he saw as a lack of ideological baggage ultimately translated – in the eyes of the public and many within his own party – into a perception that he “was, simply, not very good at politics”.
“There is something lame about him that Starmer has struggled from the start to shrug off,” said Ameer Kotecha in The Spectator. Over the course of his premiership, the Starmer who has emerged “appears constantly at the mercy of events”, while his occasional moments of “startling ruthlessness” were “even more unattractive than his mere ineptitude”.
Starmer “arrived for a career in politics unprepared for what a career in politics actually means”, said Andrew Marr in The New Statesman. In taking on the leadership of a fractured, stagnating Britain, he “chose a painful, treacherous path at an unusually difficult time”. If it “hasn’t worked”, it is “by no means all his fault”.
What next? “The beneficiary of Starmer’s demise is all but certain to be Andy Burnham,” said Sonia Sodha in The Times. Burnham is “a warm and effective communicator” – but he must use that charisma to “strike a realistically ambitious tone” and sell the public on “hard truths” about the road ahead, rather than quick-fix solutions whose inevitable failure will only benefit populist parties.
The picture for Labour has become so “bleak” that most party insiders will be happy if Burnham can simply “persuade people to give the party a second look”, Tim Bale, a politics professor at Queen Mary University of London, told The New York Times. But “if the sausage isn’t going to change, when it comes down to it, all he’s really offering is some sizzle”.
|