When Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin first suggested blocking international flights from cities that didn’t cooperate with federal immigration enforcement during an April Fox News appearance, it “seemed more like a wild swing than a real plan,” said The Atlantic. Now, Mullin’s seemingly farfetched pitch to remove immigration agents from certain airports and reroute flights to Republican-led cities feels increasingly plausible. If the plan is enacted, experts warn the impact could be catastrophic.
‘Devastating effect’ Removing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents from international airports would have a “devastating effect on the airline and tourism industries,” said trade association Airlines for America in a statement to CNN. It will cause “significant operational disruption to carriers, travelers and the flow of international cargo.”
The travel industry is “on edge,” said The Associated Press. Major airlines “quickly condemned the idea,” and “even Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said it doesn’t make sense.” The government “shouldn’t shut down air travel in a state that doesn’t agree with our politics,” said Duffy at a congressional hearing last month.
The Justice Department last month published a list of states and cities it claimed were “impeding U.S. immigration policies,” said CNBC. These included “major international air hubs” like Boston, Los Angeles, Newark and San Francisco.
‘Thin grasp of global travel logistics’ Mullin is “pushing forward anyway” with his plan, said The Atlantic. He convened a “small group of airline- and travel-industry executives at DHS headquarters in Washington” and reportedly discussed reductions in CBP staffing at “major airports that serve sanctuary jurisdictions,” such as JFK in New York and Dulles in Washington, D.C. The secretary’s plans seem to “reflect a thin grasp of global-travel logistics” and show an “inflated sense of the government’s ability to impose economic pain on specific cities.”
It’s “not clear” how Mullin’s plan to block international travel to certain cities would “work in practice,” said Time. The proposal is “actively insane,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, on X. Airlines would be forced to “cancel flights en masse,” which would cause “enormous economic damage” that extends “waaaaay beyond a few big cities that were the target.”
|