Climate change: why meat is a bigger threat than cars
Researchers say we need to cut our red meat consumption down to two portions a week to save the planet
If current levels of meat consumption continue, international targets of greenhouse gas emissions will be exceeded by the food industry alone, a new study has found.
Greenhouse gas emissions from food production are expected to rise by almost 80 per cent by 2050 unless we change our eating habits, according to new research conducted by scientists at the University of Cambridge and University of Aberdeen.
"Unless we make some serious changes in food consumption trends, we would have to completely de-carbonise the energy and industry sectors to stay within emissions budgets that avoid dangerous climate change," said co-author Professor Pete Smith, from the University of Aberdeen, according to the Daily Telegraph.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"That is practically impossible - so, as well as encouraging sustainable agriculture, we need to re-think what we eat."
Why is rearing meat so bad for the environment?
- Livestock production accounts for 14.5 per cent of global greenhouse emissions, the same amount produced by all the cars, planes, boats and trains in the world. "A single cow can belch up to 500 litres of methane every day", writes the BBC's Dr Michael Mosley, a gas that is 25 times more potent than a carbon dioxide. "Multiply that by the 1.5 billion cattle we have on our planet and that's a lot of gas."
- It is inefficient. It takes, on average, 3kg of grain to produce 1kg of meat and two thirds of all agricultural land is used to grow feed for livestock, whereas only eight per cent is used to grow food directly for human consumption. These are "basic laws of biophysics that we cannot evade," says the study's lead researcher, Bojana Bajzelj from the University of Cambridge.
- It places pressure on dwindling freshwater supplies and destroys forest and grasslands, which are turned over for grazing. Soil erosion, soil and water pollution from fertilisers and animal waste are other ways the meat industry impacts the environment.
What can be done to counter this?
In short, we need to eat less meat. "The biggest intervention people could make towards reducing their carbon footprints would not be to abandon cars, but to eat significantly less red meat," Professor Gidon Eshel, at Bard College in New York, tells The Guardian.
The latest research suggests that by cutting our consumption down to just two portions of red meat a week and a portion of poultry a day will help tackle climate change. The choice of meat is also important as the production of chickens is far less damaging to the environment in comparison to cattle or sheep. "Agricultural practices are not necessarily at fault here - but our choice of food is," says Bajzelj.
Farmers in developing countries also need to be advised on how to make sure their agricultural processes are as efficient as possible, so that they are able to produce as the highest possible yields. Scientists also argue that we need to stop wasting so much food, as on average, 7.2 million tonnes of food is wasted in the UK each year.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Ukraine fires ATACMS, Russia ups hybrid war
Speed Read Ukraine shot U.S.-provided long-range missiles and Russia threatened retaliation
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
New York DA floats 4-year Trump sentencing freeze
Speed Read President-elect Donald Trump's sentencing is on hold, and his lawyers are pushing to dismiss the case while he's in office
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Wicked fails to defy gravity
Talking Point Film version of hit stage musical weighed down by 'sense of self-importance'
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
How safe are cruise ships in storms?
The Explainer The vessels are always prepared
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Biden visits Amazon, says climate legacy irreversible
Speed Read Nobody can reverse America's 'clean energy revolution,' said the president, despite the incoming Trump administration's promises to dismantle climate policies
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is threatening Florida's Key deer
The Explainer Questions remain as to how much effort should be put into saving the animals
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Is Cop29 a 'waste of time'?
Today's Big Question World leaders stay away as spectre of Donald Trump haunts flagship UN climate summit
By The Week UK Published
-
At least 95 dead in Spain flash floods
Speed Read Torrential rainfall caused the country's worst flooding since 1996
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Earth's carbon sinks are collapsing
Under the Radar Forests and soil are not operating as usual
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Why the Earth's water cycle is under threat
Under The Radar Disturbances in the system that moves water around the world place more than half of global food production at risk
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Climate safe havens may be a thing of the past
Under the radar Safe spaces are few and far between
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published