What can the pro-choice movement do now?
The sharpest opinions on the debate from around the web

Illustrated | Getty Images, iStock
The Supreme Court appears imminently poised to overturn the national right to an abortion as protected by landmark ruling Roe v. Wade (1973).
Assuming that happens (and it seems that it will), what's next for liberals and the pro-choice movement?
1
‘My body, my choice’
The court's expected ruling would return the question of abortion to the states — many of which have so-called trigger laws, which would implement bans once Roe is overturned — but that doesn't mean the fight is over. Rather, voters and activists have the opportunity to push back.
"A movement is already underway to pay for women in restrictive states to travel and obtain abortions elsewhere," The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board opined last week, in support of state-level, rather than federal, abortion protections. "Planned Parenthood would have the biggest fund-raising years in its history. Abortion opponents might even be disappointed by the result of the political debate. They would have to make, and win, the moral case against abortion among their fellow citizens."
Writing for The Washington Post in December, columnist Henry Olsen made a somewhat similar case, arguing that pro-life activists should expect "an enormous campaign by abortion rights advocates to mobilize the pro-choice majority" should Roe v. Wade be overturned.
In fact, those protests and mobilization efforts have already begun.
That strikes me as highly unlikely (and I think everyone knows it), but it shows where the abortion rights movement is at right now. “I think everything is possible with the will of the people,” said @TheKelleyShow, executive director of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.
— Caroline Kitchener (@CAKitchener) May 3, 2022
2
Kick it to Congress
Senate Democrats might push to revive their ill-fated attempt to abolish the filibuster to codify abortion protections into law. Not long after the leak broke, high-profile liberals like senators Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Kirstin Gillibrand of New York called on Congress to do just that.
End the filibuster. Codify #RoeVWade with a national law protecting abortion rights. Expand the Supreme Court. Stop this horrifying injustice in its tracks.
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) May 3, 2022
Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wade as the law of the land in this country NOW. And if there aren’t 60 votes in the Senate to do it, and there are not, we must end the filibuster to pass it with 50 votes.
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) May 3, 2022
With far-right justices poised to overturn Roe, the lives of millions of Americans depend on us. We must codify the right to an abortion into federal law—even if it means eliminating the filibuster. We must flip state legislatures. And states like NY must open our doors. https://t.co/Eg2iZLxJNJ
— Kirsten Gillibrand (@SenGillibrand) May 3, 2022
As both the Post, and The New York Times predict, however, such a push is unlikely to be successful. Even if Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) decided to go along with the change to procedure, he is pro-life, leaving the Democrats dependent on Republican votes to pass abortion protections. In March, Manchin was the only Democrat to join Republicans in voting against the House-passed Women's Health Protection Act.
But if there's no filibuster, or a carve-out for abortion, Rs can pass a federal abortion ban with 51 votes in 2025. Do Dems think they'd just blow up the filibuster to do this anyway? Does that change their risk assessment? Probably moot, they don't have 50+VP votes rn.
— David Weigel (@daveweigel) May 3, 2022
3
Possible midterms fuel
The court's decision might also give Democrats what they're missing in the upcoming midterms: "a compelling message," columnist Karen Tumulty adds for the Post. The party now has "a concrete case to make," she argues, which is "that Republicans, if they get the chance, will take the country backward — and not just on abortion rights." Voters' ballots in November will, among other things, "be a referendum on the GOP agenda."
My statement on the reported Supreme Court decision draft. pic.twitter.com/Kt3bP0kzqU
— President Biden (@POTUS) May 3, 2022
The abortion issue is also likely to stick around beyond midterms, potentially becoming a hot topic in the 2024 presidential race, as well, Bloomberg notes.
4
Shifting focus
Lawmakers, activists, and commentators might also now turn their attention toward expanding the court, to break the conservative majority.
Overturning Roe would put the lives of women across the country at risk. It would fly in the face of decades of precedent and the overwhelming majority of public opinion. And they will not stop here. Expand the court. https://t.co/EDktEETxvb
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) May 3, 2022
A stolen, illegitimate, and far-right Supreme Court majority appears set to destroy the right to abortion, an essential right which protects the health, safety, and freedom of millions of Americans. There is no other recourse. We must expand the court.
— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) May 3, 2022
Abolish the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court. https://t.co/OPCJvyL0AA
— Rep. Veronica Escobar (@RepEscobar) May 3, 2022
Expand the Courts. Right now, the Supreme Court has an illegitimate majority with right-wing activists in Black robes thanks to Republican presidents who lost the popular vote and Mitch McConnell denying Garland a vote. No rule says you need 9, but you need it to be legitimate.
— Wajahat Ali (@WajahatAli) May 3, 2022