Liz Truss entitled to $129,000 allowance per year as ex-PM


The U.K.'s Liz Truss is eligible for a lifetime taxpayer-funded allowance of 115,000 pounds or $129,000 a year as ex-Prime Minister, despite only serving for 44 days. She resigned as Britain's prime minister on Thursday after failed fiscal plans put Britain's economy in turmoil.
With her resignation, Truss became eligible for the Public Duty Costs Allowance (PDCA), which is a reimbursement plan for costs incurred by former prime ministers for their "special position in public life," The New York Times reports. It was created in 1990 to "assist former Prime Ministers still active in public life."
According to the guidance of the PDCA, the allowance is not to be used to fund the private lives of the former prime ministers and can only be used for costs involving fulfilling public duties.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Even so, it has brought scorn from some who believe her allowance should be refused due to the economic turmoil she caused while in office, the Times continues. Christine Jardine, spokeswoman for the Cabinet Office of the Liberal Democrats said in a statement, "Truss's legacy is an economic disaster — for which the Conservatives are making taxpayers foot the bill."
Truss also became the shortest-serving prime minister in Britain's history, also raising questions as to whether she should be eligible for PDCA at all, CNN reports. Some of the opposition has called her selfish. "She's not really entitled to it, she should turn it down and not take it," said Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour Party.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Devika Rao has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022, covering science, the environment, climate and business. She previously worked as a policy associate for a nonprofit organization advocating for environmental action from a business perspective.
-
Will Donald Trump’s second state visit be a diplomatic disaster?
Today's Big Question Charlie Kirk shooting, Saturday’s far-right rally and continued Jeffrey Epstein fallout ramps-up risks of already fraught trip
-
England’s ‘dysfunctional’ children’s care system
In the Spotlight A new report reveals that protection of youngsters in care in England is failing in a profit-chasing sector
-
Cider farms to visit this autumn
The Week Recommends With harvest season fast approaching, spend an afternoon at one of these idyllic orchards
-
'Who can save France now?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to Trump
Speed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raids
Speed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raid
Speed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'
Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearing
Speed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mount
Speed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own list
speed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act