Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has halted his cooperation with the House select committee investigating the events of Jan. 6, CNN reports, an abrupt about-face from an earlier, recent decision to hand over thousands of documents and appear for an interview before the panel.
Through his lawyer, Meadows suggested his decision to be due to the fact that the committe "planned to ask him about matters he considers off-limits because of executive privilege," writes Politico.
"We agreed to provide thousands of pages of responsive documents and Mr. Meadows was willing to appear voluntarily, not under compulsion of the Select Committee's subpoena to him, for a deposition to answer questions about non-privileged matters," read a letter from Meadows' attorney, who said the committee has now made such an appearance "untenable." The committee never publicly agreed to those terms as outlined by Meadows' lawyer, and insisted the ex-Trump official was appearing under subpoena and thus open to questioning, per Politico.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"In short, we now have every indication from the information supplied to us last Friday ... that the Select Committee has no intention of respecting boundaries concerning executive privilege," the lawyer added.
During a Tuesday television appearance, Meadows also suggested his reversal had something to do with the committee having "issued a subpoena to a third party carrier trying to get information" — specifically, his phone records, Politico reports.
The panel must now decide whether to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress and pursue charges against him. His lawyer "indicated that Meadows would still consider submitting written answers to the committee's questions," according to Politico.
-
Testosterone therapy in women highlights the lack of women’s health researchThe explainer There is no FDA-approved testosterone product for women
-
Magazine solutions - November 7, 2025Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 7, 2025
-
Magazine printables - November 7, 2025Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 7, 2025
-
Judge rules US attorney ‘unlawfully serving’Speed Read Bill Essayli had been serving in the role without Senate confirmation
-
Trump ends Asia trip with Xi meeting, nuke threatSpeed Read Trump had spent the last six days in Asia
-
What does history say about Trump’s moves in Latin America?Today's Big Question ‘Bitter memories’ surface as the US targets Venezuela
-
Senate votes to kill Trump’s Brazil tariffSpeed Read Five Senate Republicans joined the Democrats in rebuking Trump’s import tax
-
Border Patrol gets scrutiny in court, gains power in ICESpeed Read Half of the new ICE directors are reportedly from DHS’s more aggressive Customs and Border Protection branch
-
Is the ceasefire in Gaza really working?Today's Big Question Neither Israel and Hamas has an interest in a full return to hostilities but ‘brutally simple arithmetic’ in region may scupper peace plan long-term
-
Shutdown stalemate nears key pain pointsSpeed Read A federal employee union called for the Democrats to to stand down four weeks into the government standoff
-
No Kings rally: What did it achieve?Feature The latest ‘No Kings’ march has become the largest protest in U.S. history
