Pence agrees to testify about Trump in federal special counsel investigation, with certain limits
Former Vice President Mike Pence will not appeal a federal judge's ruling that he must testify before a federal grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump's efforts to stay in office despite losing the 2020 election, a Pence spokesman said Wednesday. That means Pence will likely testify under oath in the coming weeks, potentially providing Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigators crucial information about Trump's actions and mindset leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol, while Pence was overseeing the congressional certification of President Biden's electoral victory.
Pence will not, however, be compelled to testify about his actions on Jan. 6 as they pertain to his ceremonial role as president of the Senate. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled last week that, as Pence's team had argued, vice presidents do have some congressional immunity from being questioned under the Constitution's "speech and debate" clause, due to their role as Senate president. "He must still testify about any illegal acts by Trump," CBS News notes.
"Pence allies say Baosberg's decision was narrower than they preferred — opening Pence up to questions about his legislative duties they had hoped would be shielded — but they have largely treated it as a victory on the principle Pence set out to defend," Politico reports.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Having vindicated that principle of the Constitution," Pence spokesman Devin O'Malley said in a statement, "Vice President Pence will not appeal the judge's ruling and will comply with the subpoena as required by law."
Trump's team had objected to Pence's testimony on different grounds, arguing their discussions were projected by executive privilege. Boasberg rejected that argument last week. "Trump and his team could still appeal the ruling, but they have lost similar cases previously," The Associated Press reports.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
‘The economics of WhatsApp have been mysterious for years’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Will Democrats impeach Kristi Noem?Today’s Big Question Centrists, lefty activists also debate abolishing ICE
-
Is a social media ban for teens the answer?Talking Point Australia is leading the charge in banning social media for people under 16 — but there is lingering doubt as to the efficacy of such laws
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
-
Trump’s power grab: the start of a new world order?Talking Point Following the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the US president has shown that arguably power, not ‘international law’, is the ultimate guarantor of security
