Pence agrees to testify about Trump in federal special counsel investigation, with certain limits

Former Vice President Mike Pence will not appeal a federal judge's ruling that he must testify before a federal grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump's efforts to stay in office despite losing the 2020 election, a Pence spokesman said Wednesday. That means Pence will likely testify under oath in the coming weeks, potentially providing Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigators crucial information about Trump's actions and mindset leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol, while Pence was overseeing the congressional certification of President Biden's electoral victory.
Pence will not, however, be compelled to testify about his actions on Jan. 6 as they pertain to his ceremonial role as president of the Senate. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled last week that, as Pence's team had argued, vice presidents do have some congressional immunity from being questioned under the Constitution's "speech and debate" clause, due to their role as Senate president. "He must still testify about any illegal acts by Trump," CBS News notes.
"Pence allies say Baosberg's decision was narrower than they preferred — opening Pence up to questions about his legislative duties they had hoped would be shielded — but they have largely treated it as a victory on the principle Pence set out to defend," Politico reports.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Having vindicated that principle of the Constitution," Pence spokesman Devin O'Malley said in a statement, "Vice President Pence will not appeal the judge's ruling and will comply with the subpoena as required by law."
Trump's team had objected to Pence's testimony on different grounds, arguing their discussions were projected by executive privilege. Boasberg rejected that argument last week. "Trump and his team could still appeal the ruling, but they have lost similar cases previously," The Associated Press reports.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Supreme Court: Will it allow Trump’s tariffs?
Feature Justices fast-track Trump’s appeal to see if his sweeping tariffs are unconstitutional
-
Venezuela: Was Trump’s air strike legal?
Feature A Trump-ordered airstrike targeted a speedboat off the coast of Venezuela, killing all 11 passengers on board
-
3 killed in Trump’s second Venezuelan boat strike
Speed Read Legal experts said Trump had no authority to order extrajudicial executions of noncombatants
-
Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The FBI’s bungled response in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting has director Kash Patel in the hot seat
-
Russian drone tests Romania as Trump spins
Speed Read Trump is ‘resisting congressional plans to impose newer and tougher penalties on Russia’s energy sector’
-
Trump renews push to fire Cook before Fed meeting
Speed Read The push to remove Cook has ‘quickly become the defining battle in Trump’s effort to take control of the Fed’
-
Will Donald Trump’s second state visit be a diplomatic disaster?
Today's Big Question Charlie Kirk shooting, Saturday’s far-right rally and continued Jeffrey Epstein fallout ramps-up risks of already fraught trip
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-war
Talking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’