Prince Andrew case: what’s in the secret Epstein-Giuffre settlement?
Royal’s lawyers given access to sealed deal – but insiders say ‘there is no Prince Andrew clause’
A US judge has given Prince Andrew’s lawyers permission to look at a sealed agreement between his accuser Virginia Giuffre and the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Giuffre claims the Queen’s son assaulted her when she was 17 years old in three locations including London and New York, an accusation he has vehemently denied.
The Duke of York’s legal team believe the contents of the 2009 settlement will nullify Giuffre’s civil sexual assault case against the royal.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The “precise wording of that deal is currently confidential – sealed by a court”, said the BBC. But the prince’s lawyers have claimed in court that Giuffre had agreed not to sue anyone else connected to Epstein when she settled damages with him 12 years ago.
The prince, who has not been charged with any crimes, must formally respond to Giuffre’s lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, by 29 October.
In a pre-trial hearing last month, Andrew’s lawyer, Andrew B Brettler, said the document “releases the duke and others from any and all potential liability”. But Giuffre’s lawyers have argued that it is “irrelevant to the case”.
Two unnamed sources close to the case told the Daily Mail last month that the agreement would not apply to the prince.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“This doesn’t apply to friends or acquaintances. If Prince Andrew is relying on this for his defence, it won’t go very far,” said one. The other said simply: “There is no Prince Andrew clause.”
The Independent explained the 2009 settlement agreement is “related to a Florida state case, which did not involve Prince Andrew”, resolving a case Giuffre had brought against Epstein, who committed suicide in a a Manhattan federal jail ten years later while awaiting a sex-trafficking trial.
It is “up for grabs whether Jeffrey Epstein – or his lawyers who crafted that 2009 settlement agreement – were attempting to build a firewall to protect those close Epstein associates in the hallowed pages of the Epstein ‘little black book’”, wrote Guy Martin in Forbes last month.
Andrew has “long been at pains to play down his decades-long association” with Epstein, said Martin. Therefore, having his lawyers claim protection from the lawsuit “by classifying the prince as an ‘associate’ or friend of Mr. Epstein’s will be a tack in the opposite direction”.
“Whether Andrew wants to hitch his wagon to that of Epstein in mounting a defence will be a question that we will be able to watch the prince’s lawyers answer.”
-
Today's political cartoons - November 19, 2024
Cartoons Tuesday's cartoons - junk food, health drinks, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Band Aid 40: time to change the tune?
In the Spotlight Band Aid's massively popular 1984 hit raised around £8m for famine relief in Ethiopia and the charity has generated over £140m in total
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Starmer vs the farmers: who will win?
Today's Big Question As farmers and rural groups descend on Westminster to protest at tax changes, parallels have been drawn with the miners' strike 40 years ago
By The Week UK Published
-
King Charles at 75: how the monarch has made his mark
Talking Point 'Modernising monarch' puts change on hold in first year in favour of stability and continuity
By The Week UK Published
-
Virginia Giuffre to pen memoir as Prince Andrew ‘plots to overturn’ £3m settlement
Speed Read Duke of York reportedly planning to launch a legal challenge against Giuffre
By The Week Staff Published
-
What the royals are doing for Christmas
Under the Radar Senior members of the family will gather at Sandringham but are likely to scale back festivities
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Queen’s corgis to have new home
Speed Read The pets are to return to familiar ground in Windsor
By Julia O'Driscoll Published
-
What are the pros and cons of the monarchy?
Pros and Cons Majority of Britons still favour having a royal family but support is waning
By Sorcha Bradley Last updated
-
Forgiving Prince Andrew: can the country ever move on?
Talking Point Justin Welby back-pedalled after his call for forgiveness sparked an angry backlash
By The Week Staff Published
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s jubilee agenda
feature Sussexes told not to ‘overshadow the Queen’ but Netflix may ‘not have got the memo’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
The Palace Papers: what Tina Brown’s ‘bombshell’ book reveals about the royals
feature New tell-all account gives insiders’ views of palace rows and scandals
By The Week Staff Published