More than 14,000 migrants have arrived in Britain illegally this year by crossing the Channel in small boats, said The Daily Telegraph. Many Britons are furious that people-smugglers are still making “a mockery of UK borders”.
The Home Secretary, Priti Patel, is “frustrated” too: she is threatening to “pull the plug” on a failing £54m deal with France to prevent migrants leaving its coast. She has also secured new advice from the Attorney General authorising Border Force to “push back” migrant boats into French waters: officials have been filmed using jet skis to turn around dinghies during practice drills off the Kent coast.
This policy has caused an outcry, but I know that it can work, said Alexander Downer, Australia’s former minister for foreign affairs, in the Daily Mail. Australia did it when “large numbers of economic migrants” began arriving in our waters from Indonesia. Patrol boats intercepted the smugglers’ vessels, repaired and refuelled them, then pointed them back towards Indonesia. It became very clear that we were going to stamp out people-smuggling, and the numbers were soon greatly reduced.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Such a policy would face a great many practical problems, said The Times. Legally, the migrants would have to be intercepted before they had reached British waters. Their boats would have to be seaworthy, not overloaded, and capable of returning to the French coast. The French coastguard would probably have to escort them back. And if migrants jumped into the sea, British officials would legally have to rescue them.
The key to solving this problem isn’t pushing back boats, it’s sensible cooperation with France. More importantly, it’s a deeply “callous” policy, said Sean O’Grady in The Independent. Are we really contemplating leaving migrants stuck “in limbo, waiting to sink”, between two of the richest nations on Earth? How long before some “poor desperate Afghan” is found “dead in the water”? The Government will bear responsibility for any deaths. Border Force staff must understand the repercussions if they “obey orders”.
It’s not yet clear whether this is official policy, said Diane Taylor in The Guardian. In the past, many of Patel’s plans to tackle the migrant crisis have come to nothing. She has previously suggested holding asylum seekers in “processing centres” outside the UK; and greatly increasing deportations. She has even mooted “installing giant wave machines” in the Channel. None of these plans ever came to fruition. It has also been rumoured that she might yet lose her job. The chances of the push-back scheme “actually being put into practice are slim”.
-
Is there a Christmas truce in the Starmer farmer ding-dong?Today’s Big Question There’s an ‘early present’ for farmers but tensions between Labour and rural communities remain
-
The history of US nuclear weapons on UK soilThe Explainer Arrangement has led to protests and dangerous mishaps
-
Tea with Judi Dench: ‘touching’ show is must-watch Christmas TVThe Week Recommends The national treasure sits down with Kenneth Branagh at her country home for a heartwarming ‘natter’
-
Trump vs. states: Who gets to regulate AI?Feature Trump launched a task force to challenge state laws on artificial intelligence, but regulation of the technology is under unclear jurisdiction
-
Pipe bombs: The end of a conspiracy theory?Feature Despite Bongino and Bondi’s attempt at truth-telling, the MAGAverse is still convinced the Deep State is responsible
-
Trump: Losing energy and supportFeature Polls show that only one of his major initiatives—securing the border—enjoys broad public support
-
Trump’s poll collapse: can he stop the slide?Talking Point President who promised to ease cost-of-living has found that US economic woes can’t be solved ‘via executive fiat’
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
-
The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?Talking Point With the Saudis investing $1 trillion into the US, and Trump granting them ‘major non-Nato ally’ status, for now the two countries need each other
