Brexit breakthrough: what is back on the negotiating table?
Brussels offers better-than-expected proposals for the Northern Ireland Protocol
The UK government is digesting an offer from the European Commission to scrap 80% of spot checks on foods coming into Northern Ireland from Britain.
The proposal, announced by the EU’s Brexit negotiator Maros Sefcovic yesterday, is “a significant concession” from Brussels “to ease post-Brexit border problems”, said The Guardian.
The offer came a day after Sefcovic’s UK counterpart David Frost demanded a total end to the Northern Ireland Protocol, set up after Brexit to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The protocol has effectively created a trade border in the Irish Sea –triggering months of disagreement between the UK and EU over border checks that Frost has described as “disruptive” and “damaging” for the nation.
Under the EU proposals, “goods destined for Northern Ireland only could go in an ‘express lane’ when arriving in the province from Britain”, explained The Telegraph’s Europe editor James Crisp. And customs paperwork would be cut by around 50%.
In return, “Brussels wants real-time access to UK trade databases in order to police which products cross into the Republic of Ireland, the EU’s external border”.
UK officials acknowledged that the proposals went further than expected, said the Financial Times. “But they fall short of Frost’s benchmark that for businesses in Great Britain, trading with Belfast should be as easy as commerce with Birmingham”.
The bloc also “refused to engage” on the UK’s demand for an end to the European Court of Justice’s role in oversight of the protocol. Frost argued that the court’s involvement created a “false sense of separation between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as trade arrangements operated within one part of the United Kingdom are ultimately overseen outside of it”.
Brussels insisted that if Northern Ireland follows EU rules for goods, it must accept the writ of the ECJ.
Despite that sticking point, Frost has vowed to work “very hard” to agree a deal, in a sign that the threat of unilaterally suspending parts of protocol “had been put on ice for now”, said The Telegraph’s Crisp.
“There is growing expectation that a fix can be found to keep EU judges at arms length in Northern Ireland,” he added.
The Guardian had a different take, reporting that Brussels officials “were ‘preparing for the worst’ amid signs Boris Johnson is set to reject the terms of the deal”. The chances of a compromise “appeared low”, said the paper.
Labour’s shadow minister for Task Force Europe, Jenny Chapman, said concerns are growing that the outcome will be “a mid-November showdown, with the UK invoking Article 16 and unilaterally ripping up the agreement” that Frost and Johnson negotiated back in 2019.
While this approach would “no doubt appeal to many on the government’s back benches”, wrote Chapman in an article for The Independent, “it would be damaging, counterproductive, and cause further instability”.
She warned of an “inevitable trade war with our biggest trade partners”, at a time when the country is already facing “a growing winter crisis as well as tensions in Northern Ireland”.
DUP MP Ian Paisley suggested last night that abandoning the protocol had been the plan along. “Boris Johnson did tell me personally... after agreeing to the protocol, he would sign up to changing that protocol and indeed tearing it up,” he told the BBC’s Newsnight programme.
The prime minister’s former top aide made similar claims in an online tirade yesterday. Dominic Cummings, who “has been a vocal critic of his former boss” since leaving Downing Street acrimoniously last year, “hurled grenades at Johnson in a series of late-night tweets”, said Politico’s Emilio Casalicchio.
The UK government “wriggled through with the best option we could” and then planned to “ditch bits we didn't like” after “whacking” Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in the 2019 general election, claimed Cummings.
If true, “the PM was dead right to do so – given the hideous twin risks in 2019 of a Corbyn government and Remainers then overturning the Leave vote”, said The Sun in an editorial.
“Brexit is done,” the paper proclaimed, and the protocol “is being radically improved, as he hoped”.
The Times argued that Johnson was “given a mandate to get Brexit done, not to renege on international agreements voluntarily entered into”.
Now, said the paper, it is time to “instruct Lord Frost to get down to business, secure a workable compromise and finally deliver his promise”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Man United finally lost patience with ten Hag
Talking Point After another loss United sacked ten Hag in hopes of success in the Champion's League
By The Week UK Published
-
Who are the markets backing in the US election?
Talking Point Speculators are piling in on the Trump trade. A Harris victory would come as a surprise
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: November 3, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
What might a Trump victory mean for the global economy?
Today's Big Question A second term in office for the 'America First' administration would send shockwaves far beyond the United States' shores
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why might The Washington Post's nonendorsement matter more?
Today's Big Question The Jeff Bezos-owned publication's last-minute decision to rescind its presidential preference might not tip the electoral scales, but it could be a sign of ominous things to come
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Was Georgia's election stolen?
Today's Big Question The incumbent Georgian Dream party seized a majority in the disputed poll, defying predictions
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Will Elon Musk's million-dollar election scheme pay off?
Today's Big Question By offering a million bucks to prospective voters to sign his pro-Trump petition, the Tesla billionaire is playing a risky electoral game — and a potentially criminal one, too
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How would slavery reparations work?
Today's Big Question Caribbean nations lead call for 'meaningful' conversations on reparations at Commonwealth summit
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is legal weed a bipartisan issue now?
Today's Big Question Trump and Harris both favor legalization
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is Labour risking the 'special relationship'?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer forced to deny Donald Trump's formal complaint that Labour staffers are 'interfering' to help Harris campaign
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published