Is Channel 4 a victim of Tory spite?
The institution is ‘a great British success story’ – so why sell it?
Forty years after it was launched by Margaret Thatcher’s government, Channel 4 is being put up for sale, said Steven Barnett on The Conversation. The decision to press ahead with legislation this year, announced by Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries, is a risky one which has been widely condemned as an act of “cultural vandalism”. Channel 4 is, after all, “a great British success story”.
A stateowned channel that doesn’t employ its own creative staff, it commissions programmes from independent production companies – a flourishing sector that it has played a vital role in creating. It supports more than 10,000 jobs, all over the UK; it is required by law to promote diversity, innovation and new talent. It doesn’t cost the taxpayer a penny. And it makes a profit, too – a “record” £74m in 2020, all of which was ploughed back into programmes. So why sell it? Dorries says putting it in private hands will encourage innovation and allow it to “compete more effectively” with streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon Prime.
That makes no sense at all, said Ayesha Hazarika in the London Evening Standard. Channel 4 already has a “huge streaming service”, All4, and makes globally successful shows from Gogglebox and Come Dine With Me to dramas such as It’s a Sin and comedies including Derry Girls. It’s edgy and irreverent, but the channel also has a strong news and educational remit, which could be lost if it becomes “Netflix-lite”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The only convincing explanation for the privatisation is that it is driven by senior Tories’ “visceral hatred” of Channel 4 News. The Conservative MP Julian Knight, chairman of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, suggested that it was “revenge” for the news show’s “biased” coverage of Brexit and its “personal attacks” on the PM (whom it replaced with a block of ice when he failed to show up for a climate change debate). How ridiculous, to wreck one of Thatcher’s greatest cultural achievements out of sheer spite.
The idea that Thatcher would oppose Channel 4’s privatisation is “ludicrous”, said Andrew Roberts in The Daily Telegraph: she would be “cheering on” Dorries’ plans. Back in 1982, there were only three TV channels, and Thatcher wanted “a genuine diversity of views” broadcast, something that Channel 4 once did. Now there are 333 channels and it has become a “virulently anti-Tory, crypto-Corbynite propaganda outlet, parroting the views of London’s metropolitan establishment”. Thatcher would be embarrassed by the Frankenstein’s monster she had created, and would want it exposed to “the cold winds of competition, albeit around 20 years too late”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Alaska faces earth-shaking loss as seismic monitoring stations shutterIN THE SPOTLIGHT NOAA cuts have left the western seaboard without a crucial resource to measure, understand and predict tsunamis
-
10 great advent calendars for everyone (including the dog)The Week Recommends Countdown with cocktails, jams and Legos
-
How could worsening consumer sentiment affect the economy?Today’s Big Question Sentiment dropped this month to a near-record low
-
Obamacare: Why premiums are rocketingFeature The rise is largely due to the Dec. 31 expiration of pandemic-era ‘enhanced’ premium subsidies, which are at the heart of the government shutdown
-
The GOP: Will it welcome antisemites?Feature That Carlson would grant Fuentes access to his massive audience is proof that his hate ‘is entering the MAGA mainstream’
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
Democrats: Falling for flawed outsidersfeature Graham Platner’s Senate bid in Maine was interrupted by the resurfacing of his old, controversial social media posts
-
Trump’s White House ballroom: a threat to the republic?Talking Point Trump be far from the first US president to leave his mark on the Executive Mansion, but to critics his remodel is yet more overreach
-
Meet Ireland’s new socialist presidentIn the Spotlight Landslide victory of former barrister and ‘outsider’ Catherine Connolly could ‘mark a turning point’ in anti-establishment politics
-
Should TV adverts reflect the nation?Talking Point Reform MP Sarah Pochin’s controversial comments on black and Asian actors in adverts expose a real divide on race and representation
-
Voting Rights Act: SCOTUS’s pivotal decisionFeature A Supreme Court ruling against the Voting Rights Act could allow Republicans to redraw districts and solidify control of the House