Liverpool stripped of Unesco status: could this ‘logical conclusion’ turn out to be a good thing?
Last week, a committee in China voted to strip the city of its World Heritage status, citing ‘irreversible’ damage

For 17 years, the waterfront of my home city of Liverpool has been ranked alongside the likes of the Taj Mahal and the Great Wall of China as a site of “outstanding value to humanity”, said Imogen Cooper in the Daily Mail. “But no more.”
Why? Because at a meeting 4,894 miles away in China last week, a Unesco committee voted to strip it of its status as a World Heritage Site, citing “irreversible” damage caused by new developments.
Never mind that the site includes the Albert Dock, home to more Grade I listed buildings than anywhere else in Britain, and the monumental “Three Graces” – the Royal Liver, the Cunard and the Port of Liverpool Buildings – on the Mersey. And never mind the 54 million tourists who flock here annually for our rich culture and history. Unesco has made up its mind – making Liverpool only the third site ever to be kicked off its list, after Dresden’s Elbe Valley and Oman’s Arabian Oryx Sanctuary.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
I’m shocked it took them this long, said Oliver Wainwright in The Guardian. Liverpool council has been trampling on the city’s architectural heritage for years to make way for “atrocious” new developments.
Perhaps the worst are a trio of huge black blocks built in 2013, which ruined the waterfront view of the Three Graces. They joined a Carbuncle Cup-winning ferry terminal; and the “colossal mess” that is the Museum of Liverpool.
But the biggest concerns were over the two planned developments: Liverpool Waters project, a £5bn “60-hectare jamboree of half-baked towers”, which put the city on Unesco’s “danger list” in 2012; and Everton’s new £500m stadium, a “great silver slug” at Bramley-Moore Dock. Now the “unbridled contempt” with which Liverpool’s leaders have treated their city’s architectural heritage has “come to its logical conclusion”.
Actually, Unesco’s decision says more about the “wrong-headed priorities of the cultural cognoscenti” than anything else, said The Times. Sure, not all of Liverpool’s recent developments are beautiful. But it’s hard to disagree with the city’s mayor, Joanne Anderson, who asked whether Unesco would prefer the docks to “remain a derelict wasteland, rather than making a positive contribution to the city’s future”.
Unesco’s designation – of the entire “Maritime Mercantile City” – was always too broad anyway, said Edwin Heathcote in the FT, rendering it difficult to redevelop swathes of empty land. So the Unesco decision, while “a knock to its dignity”, may turn out to be good for Liverpool, if it can focus on architectural quality in future. After all, it is “a terrific city” and “it deserves the best new buildings”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Depleted FEMA struggling as hurricane season begins
speed read FEMA has lost a third of its workforce amid DOGE cuts enforced by President Donald Trump
-
June 3 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Tuesday's political cartoons include RFK Jr. and the CDC, Elon Musk's DOGE exit, and Donald Trump versus academic freedom
-
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation: the group behind Gaza's controversial new aid programme
The Explainer Deadly shootings and chaotic scenes have been reported at aid sites after US group replaced UN humanitarian organisations
-
Earring lost at sea returned to fisherman after 23 years
feature Good news stories from the past seven days
-
Bully XL dogs: should they be banned?
Talking Point Goverment under pressure to prohibit breed blamed for series of fatal attacks
-
Netanyahu’s reforms: an existential threat to Israel?
feature The nation is divided over controversial move depriving Israel’s supreme court of the right to override government decisions
-
Farmer plants 1.2m sunflowers as present for his wife
feature Good news stories from the past seven days
-
EU-Tunisia agreement: a ‘dangerous’ deal to curb migration?
feature Brussels has pledged to give €100m to Tunisia to crack down on people smuggling and strengthen its borders
-
Manchester alleyway transformed into a plant-filled haven
feature Good news stories from the past seven days
-
China’s ‘sluggish’ economy: squeezing the middle classes
feature Reports of the death of the Chinese economy may be greatly exaggerated say analysts
-
Non-aligned no longer: Sweden embraces Nato
feature While Swedes believe it will make them safer Turkey’s grip over the alliance worries some