During Rishi Sunak’s recent visit to Washington, he announced the UK would host “the first global summit” on artificial-intelligence regulation later this year, said Astha Rajvanshi in Time.
There’s a pressing need for it. In March, a group of AI experts raised the alarm about the risks to society posed by OpenAI’s ChatGPT and the like, calling for “a six-month pause in development”. Last month, an open letter signed by hundreds of AI executives – including the CEOs of OpenAI and Google DeepMind – stated that mitigating “the risk of extinction” from AI should be a global priority, up there with fending off “pandemics and nuclear war”.
It’s a moot point, though, whether a “midsize country” like the UK is really best placed to embrace the challenge of becoming the world’s AI referee. Sunak “bristled” when the question was put to him. But the cynical view is that the gambit is an attempt to find some kind of global significance, post-Brexit.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“It’s hard not to cringe” at Sunak’s declaration that Britain should “lead the way”, said Parmy Olson on Bloomberg. After all, Brexit “hasn’t exactly inspired confidence in British policymaking”.
Yet Brexit is partly why the UK could successfully fill the watchdog role. AI is moving fast and, “having thrown off the shackles of EU frameworks and obligations”, Britain could quickly draw up rules. By contrast, it will be another two years before the EU’s AI Act comes into force, and “aggressive Silicon Valley lobbying” makes it unlikely the US will set up an independent AI regulator any time soon.
The Brits have other assets too, including a history of moving fast on tech governance and “a formidable commercial law sector”. London hosts one of the world’s biggest AI companies, Google DeepMind, whose technologists regularly advise the Government. All in, it offers “a temperate middle ground between the onerous approach of Europe and the more laissez-faire US”.
This is a “pivotal” moment for the UK tech scene, said Brent Hoberman in The Times. Finally, we have a Government that is showing real leadership.
Well, up to a point, said The Economist. “Sunak’s vim and his readiness to champion AI are welcome”, but his plans to become a global hub could well fall short. The main issue is that US dominance in tech “exerts a steady pull on capital, people and ideas, and American firms duly dominate in AI”. Another is our lack of what techies call “compute” – the big “GPU” chip clusters that AI needs to train and run large models. At present, we’d even struggle to ensure “a reliable supply of clean, affordable energy”.
It’s good to think big, but there are plenty of hurdles to overcome before “BritGPT” becomes an AI “superpower”.
