US ‘ready to resume talks’ with North Korea
Mike Pompeo invites Pyongyang foreign minister to a meeting in New York next week

The US has revealed its willingness to resume talks with North Korea, following a meeting between Kim Jong Un and South Korean president Moon Jae-in at which Kim pledged to dismantle key parts of his nuclear weapons programme.
Following Kim and Moon’s meeting this week in Pyongyang, North Korea said it would close down key missile facilities and “permanently dismantle” facilities central to fuel production for nuclear warheads, provided the US took “unspecified actions”, Reuters says.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced he had invited North Korean foreign minister Ri Yong-ho to New York next week, in a bid to re-start talks aimed at achieving denuclearisation by 2021.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“This will mark the beginning of negotiations to transform US-DPRK relations through the process of rapid denuclearisation of North Korea,” Pompeo said in a statement.
Pompeo has also asked other North Korean officials to meet the new US special envoy, Stephen Biegun, in Vienna on an unspecified date.
The New York Times says that despite the offer put forward by North Korea falling “far short of what American officials have demanded”, Donald Trump nonetheless congratulated Kim and Moon over the agreement signed after their meeting on Wednesday.
However, the Times notes that the agreement between North and South Korea “seemed aimed more at reducing tensions along their shared border than moving quickly toward denuclearisation”.
The deal also sidesteps US demands for North Korea to surrender all of its nuclear capabilities before negotiations begin, instead allowing Pyongyang to work with South Korea on a step-by-step process of dismantling the weapons programme.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How will Trump's megabill affect you?
Today's Big Question Republicans have passed the 'big, beautiful bill' through Congress
-
Scientists are the latest 'refugees'
In the spotlight Brain drain to brain gain
-
5 dreamy books to dive into this July
The Week Recommends A 'politically charged' collection of essays, historical fiction goes sci-fi and more
-
IAEA: Iran could enrich uranium 'within months'
Speed Read The chief United Nations nuclear inspector, Rafael Grossi, says Iran could be enriching uranium again soon
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan
-
US says Trump vetoed Israeli strike on Khamenei
Speed Read This comes as Israel and Iran pushed their conflict into its fourth day
-
After Israel's brazen Iran attack, what's next for the region and the world?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Following decades of saber-rattling, Israel's aerial assault on Iranian military targets has pushed the Middle East to the brink of all-out war
-
Why Israel is attacking Iran now
The Explainer A weakened Tehran and a distracted Donald Trump have led Benjamin Netanyahu to finally act against long-standing foe