Waspi women see state pension changes claim rejected by government

Labour initially planned to ‘retake’ decision not to compensate women but have reaffirmed original choice

A group of women representing the Waspi protest group stand outside the Houses of Parliament
Waspi women have faced another rejection
(Image credit: Leon Neal / Getty Images)

Women born in the 1950s who missed out on state pension payments have been dealt a further blow, after the government “again rejected” their calls for compensation, said the BBC.

The Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) group claimed 3.6 million women now in their late 60s and early 70s were given inadequate or no notice concerning a rise in the state pension age that brought them into line with men.

But affected women have reacted “with fury” after the government came to the same conclusion as in December 2024, following a review of the matter over the last months.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Who are the Waspi women?

The Waspi campaign is “fighting for justice for all women born in the 1950s” who were affected by changes to the women’s state pension age, which increased from 60 to 68 between 2010 and 2018 to align with men’s state pension age.

The group insists the age alteration was implemented with “too little notice”, said MoneyWeek, consequently leaving many “unable to plan adequately for retirement”.

What has happened?

Women affected by the state pension decision took their complaint to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and were told the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) did not adequately inform thousands of women that their state pension age had changed.

The result was that women “lost opportunities” to make informed decisions about their retirement, impacting their “personal autonomy and financial control”, the report stated.

Ultimately, the review by the ombudsman, published in March 2024, ruled in favour of the Waspi women, deeming that the DWP was guilty of “maladministration”. It recommended payments of between £1,000 and £2,950 to the affected women, which would “put the total bill at up to £10.5 billion”, said The i Paper.

In December 2024, the government accepted the verdict, but “dismissed the recommendation of compensation”. Though Labour accepted historic miscommunication about state pension changes while in opposition, it later concluded “taxpayer-funded compensation could not be justified”.

What is the latest development?

Nearly a year later, Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden said the government would “retake” its previous decision to reject the rejected recommendation. However, McFadden added that such a move “should not be taken as an indication” that the government will decide to issue compensation.

Now it appears, this statement has come to fruition, with the secretary confirming the government had reached “the same conclusion as announced in December 2024”. He expressed the government’s agreement with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman that women “did not suffer any direct financial loss from the delay”.

What next for Waspi women?

Angela Madden, chairwoman of the Waspi group, accused the government of showing “utter contempt” for affected women. “The Government has kicked the can down the road for months, only to arrive at exactly the same conclusion it has always wanted to,” she said.

Waspi’s legal fight against the government is also likely to continue, despite the most recent developments. The group has raised more than £270,000 to fund its legal challenge, while also securing a costs-capping order in June 2025.

Rebekah Evans joined The Week as newsletter editor in 2023 and has written on subjects ranging from Ukraine and Afghanistan to fast fashion and "brotox". She started her career at Reach plc, where she cut her teeth on news, before pivoting into personal finance at the height of the pandemic and cost-of-living crisis. Social affairs is another of her passions, and she has interviewed people from across the world and from all walks of life. Rebekah completed an NCTJ with the Press Association and has written for publications including The Guardian, The Week magazine, the Press Association and local newspapers.