The Senate's nixed dress code isn't short of mixed reactions
Conservatives are taking issue with the axing of a longstanding Senate tradition


There are a lot of tense happenings in the U.S. Capitol building right now. The threat of a government shutdown is looming, some House Republicans are pushing to impeach President Biden and new polling shows 72% of Americans disapprove of Congress, a near-record high.
However, the current debate among both congressional leaders seems focused not on any of these issues, but on something more minute: the axing of the U.S. Senate's dress code.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) recently "directed the Senate's Sergeant at Arms to no longer enforce the chamber's informal dress code for its members," Axios first reported. This means that senators will be able to enter Congress' upper chamber without the traditional business attire typically worn by politicians.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This report was immediately followed by backlash, mostly from the conservative side of the aisle. Many Republicans appeared angry that the dress code, which had been longstanding in the Senate, was being done away with, though some Democrats chimed in with arguments of their own.
What are the details of the dress code change?
Some argued the change was simply implemented to allow for a fresh look in the upper chamber. However, it appears that the decision to relax senatorial clothing requirements was implemented mostly for Sen. John Fetterman (D-Penn.).
Fetterman has become nationally known for wearing shorts and hoodies while in the Capitol, shunning the full suit donned by most senators. Due to this dress code violation, Fetterman "often votes from doorways or sticks his head inside the chambers to avoid getting into trouble for his more casual wear," USA Today reported.
Schumer didn't mention Fetterman by name when making the announcement. But the change is clearly directed at him, given that Fetterman "unapologetically [wears] shorts as he goes about his duties," The Associated Press noted, rarely seen in professional wear except for his official Senate portrait.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But while the change was clearly made so that Fetterman could step onto the Senate floor, he is "hardly the only senator to occasionally eschew a coat and tie," Roll Call reported. On Mondays, senators often "show up for the first votes of the week in ...cargo shorts, cowboy boots, T-shirts, rain jackets and sneakers," the outlet added.
What was the reaction to the change?
Many conservative politicians reacted in anger to the change, saying it lowered Senate standards.
"The Senate no longer enforcing a dress code for senators to appease Fetterman is disgraceful," Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. She called a dress code "one of society’s standards that set etiquette and respect for our institutions."
Others, such as Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), claimed Fetterman was being disrespectful with his dressing. "There’s a side of me that’s super excited about it because I hate wearing a tie, and I’d rather be in blue jeans and a pair of boots and a white T-shirt," Mullin told Fox Business. "But the fact is, that you do dress for the job. And we need to be respectful of the position we hold."
Many Democrats countered that Republicans should be worried about more pressing matters than dress codes. This includes Fetterman himself, who hit back at a number of conservatives who called out his clothes. In a response to Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), Fetterman noted there were "t-minus 16 days" until a government shutdown, adding, "Instead of crying about how I dress, how about you get your shit together and do your job, bud?"
Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) concurred, replying to Greene, "Seriously? You’re bitching about Senate dress code when House Republicans are about to drive the federal government off a cliff? Again? Talk about disgraceful."
What will happen next?
Dress code changes have occurred before, and "there is precedent for tweaking the rules of what elected officials can wear on the Hill," The Washington Post reported. This notably occurred in 2017 when the rules were changed to allow women to wear sleeveless tops and open-toed shoes.
The full scale of the new dress code remains to be seen. However, Richard Thompson Ford, a Stanford law professor, told USA Today that the new rules "simply acknowledged that the norms of professional dress have changed."
"People judge each other by their appearance and attire," Ford added. "But written dress codes are certainly under attack. It might be a swing of a pendulum. But no doubt the trend is away from formal rules."
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
What to know before turning to AI for financial advice
the explainer It can help you crunch the numbers — but it might also pocket your data
-
Book reviews: 'The Headache: The Science of a Most Confounding Affliction—and a Search for Relief' and 'Tonight in Jungleland: The Making of Born to Run'
Feature The search for a headache cure and revisiting Springsteen's 'Born to Run' album on its 50th anniversary
-
Keith McNally' 6 favorite books that have ambitious characters
Feature The London-born restaurateur recommends works by Leo Tolstoy, John le Carré, and more
-
What are blue slips and why does Trump want to end them?
Today's Big Question The practice lets senators block a president's judge and prosecutor nominees
-
Texas OKs gerrymander sought by Trump
Speed Read The House approved a new congressional map aimed at flipping Democratic-held seats to Republican control
-
The census: Why Trump wants a new one
Feature Donald Trump is pushing for a 'Trumpified census' that excludes undocumented immigrants
-
The red state push to join the DC occupation
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Republican governors are increasingly eager to volunteer their state's National Guard troops for Trump's ostensibly anti-crime siege of the nation's capital
-
It is 'beyond time for us to seek bipartisan solutions' for Afghanistan
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
What's a pocket rescission and can Trump use one?
The Explainer The White House may try to use an obscure and prohibited trick to halt more spending
-
Israel: Losing the American public
Feature A recent poll finds American support for Israel's military action in Gaza has fallen from 50% to 32%
-
Texas gerrymander battle spreads to other states
Feature If Texas adopts its new electoral map, blue states plan to retaliate with Democrat-favored districts