The Taliban fighters traded for Bowe Bergdahl wouldn't have been at Gitmo for long, anyway

The Taliban fighters traded for Bowe Bergdahl wouldn&#039;t have been at Gitmo for long, anyway

(Image credit: US Army/Wikimedia Commons)

last updated 8 January 2015

President Obama's decision to trade Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five senior Taliban members detained at Guantanamo Bay is complicated legally, tactically, and politically. But ultimately the question boils down to: Was it worth it? One solider for five hardened militants may be tough math to some, but it's a little fuzzier than that.

Maybe the Taliban somehow pulled a fast one on the U.S., but the U.S. was probably going to release the five Taliban fighters within a year, anyway. As Ken Gude explains at Think Progress, Obama is essentially ending the Afghanistan War by 2016, and "when wars end, prisoners taken custody must be released." The Taliban may not have complied with that international law, but the U.S. would have to, he argues. "The five detainees that were included in the deal would have to be released soon anyway because the U.S. involvement in the armed conflict against the Taliban is ending."

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

In my view, the U.S. would not be able to hold [the five detainees] forever. Indeed, it is likely that the U.S. would be required, as a matter of international law, to release them shortly after the end of 2014, when U.S. combat operations cease in Afghanistan. The administration appears to have reached a defensible, hold-your-nose compromise by arranging, in exchange for the release of Sergeant Bergdahl, for the individuals to be held in Qatar for a year before they return to Afghanistan. [Lawfare]

That's not to suggest this was a cut-and-dry good decision. Some members of Bergdahl's platoon are arguing that Bergdahl was a deserter whose decision to flee the base cost the lives of at least two soldiers trying to track him down. (The Pentagon says there's no evidence that anyone died searching for Bergdahl.) And legally, there's a decent chance Obama sidestepped requirements passed by Congress regarding the transfer of prisoners from Guantanamo Bay (Jack Goldsmith makes that case; Marty Lederman disagrees somewhat).

But strategically, maybe trading Bergdahl for the five Taliban fighters wasn't such a bad deal.

Explore More

Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.