Rand Paul wants the federal government to stop overseeing marriage
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Presidential hopeful Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) spoke out for the first time Sunday on the Supreme Court's decision to grant same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide. He argued the federal government shouldn't oversee marriage at all, regardless of a given couple's genders, in a Time op-ed:
The Constitution is silent on the question of marriage because marriage has always been a local issue. Our founding fathers went to the local courthouse to be married, not to Washington, D.C. I've often said I don't want my guns or my marriage registered in Washington. [Time]
He also said he disagreed with the court's decision, but believes "all Americans have the right to contract," backing Justice Clarence Thomas' dissent, which argues individual liberty is not connected to government entitlement.
"There is a reason [our Constitution] was the first where rights came from our creator and therefore could not be taken away by government," Paul wrote.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Julie Kliegman is a freelance writer based in New York. Her work has appeared in BuzzFeed, Vox, Mental Floss, Paste, the Tampa Bay Times and PolitiFact. Her cats can do somersaults.
