Less than 24 hours after The New York Times added a three-paragraph editor's note to an anonymously sourced article on San Bernardino shooter Tashfeen Malik, The New York Times' public editor Margaret Sullivan condemned the paper's lack of skepticism.
Sullivan charges that the story's incorrect allegation that Malik "talked openly on social media" about radicalism stems from a "failure of sufficient skepticism at every level of the reporting and editing process" and too heavy a reliance on anonymous government sources — a sign, Sullivan says, that "systemic change" is necessary:
The Times needs to fix its overuse of unnamed government sources. And it needs to slow down the reporting and editing process, especially in the fever-pitch atmosphere surrounding a major news event. Those are procedural changes, and they are needed. But most of all, and more fundamental, the paper needs to show far more skepticism — a kind of prosecutorial scrutiny — at every level of the process. [The New York Times]
This marks the second instance the Times has posted an editor's note on a "front-page, anonymously sourced" story in the last six months. In July, the paper incorrectly alleged that Hillary Clinton was the subject of a criminal inquiry regarding her email use as secretary of state, resulting in the paper issuing two corrections alongside an editor's note.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"That's not acceptable for Times readers or for the paper's credibility, which is its most precious asset," Sullivan writes. "If this isn't a red alert, I don't know what will be."
-
5 artfully drawn cartoons about Donald Trump's Epstein doodleCartoons Artists take on a mountainous legacy, creepy art, and more
-
Violent videos of Charlie Kirk’s death are renewing debate over online censorshipTalking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
What led to Poland invoking NATO’s Article 4 and where could it lead?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION After a Russian drone blitz, Warsaw’s rare move to invoke the important NATO statute has potentially moved Europe closer to continent-wide warfare
-
Nobody seems surprised Wagner's Prigozhin died under suspicious circumstancesSpeed Read
-
Western mountain climbers allegedly left Pakistani porter to die on K2Speed Read
-
'Circular saw blades' divide controversial Rio Grande buoys installed by Texas governorSpeed Read
-
Los Angeles city workers stage 1-day walkout over labor conditionsSpeed Read
-
Mega Millions jackpot climbs to an estimated $1.55 billionSpeed Read
-
Bangladesh dealing with worst dengue fever outbreak on recordSpeed Read
-
Glacial outburst flooding in Juneau destroys homesSpeed Read
-
Scotland seeking 'monster hunters' to search for fabled Loch Ness creatureSpeed Read
