Chuck Schumer claims he wasn't opposed to all Bush SCOTUS nominations in 2007

Senator Schumer sats he did not oppose every SCOTUS candidate in 2007.

(Image credit: Olivier Douliery/Getty Images)

published 16 February 2016

In the growing debate over whether the Senate should vote on President Obama's forthcoming Supreme Court nomination to replace Antonin Scalia, conservatives are hinging on an argument made by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) in 2007, when the tables were turned.

"We should not confirm any [George W.] Bush nominee to the Supreme Court, except in extraordinary circumstances," Schumer said at the time.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

What I said in the speech given in 2007 is simple: Democrats, after a hearing, should entertain voting no if the nominee is out of the mainstream and tries to cover that fact up. There was no hint anywhere in the speech that there shouldn't be hearings or a vote. Only that if after hearings and a vote, Democrats determined that the nominee was out of the mainstream and trying to hide it, they should have no qualms about voting no. Nor was there any hint that this idea that Democrats should oppose hard right ideologues should apply only in the fourth year of the president’s term. In fact, I said it should apply to this president, George W. Bush, or any future president whenever they nominated such a candidate. [Medium]

Explore More

Julie Kliegman is a freelance writer based in New York. Her work has appeared in BuzzFeed, Vox, Mental Floss, Paste, the Tampa Bay Times and PolitiFact. Her cats can do somersaults.