Republican pollster Frank Luntz empaneled a group of undecided voters in Las Vegas to watch Wednesday night's final debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump for CBS News, and the voters appeared to grudgingly be closer to picking a candidate afterward. "This was a great evening for voters, because it helped them make up their minds," Luntz said. He asked people to give one word for Trump, and the responses include "ignorant," "struggled," "improved," "blowhard," "inadequate," "passionate," "P.T. Barnum," and "rude." For Clinton, people picked "presidential," "competent," "snoozefest," "criminal actress," "more believable," and "politician."
"Not particularly good for either candidate," Luntz said. "This is not the evaluation I would want from my teacher." He showed two clips from the debate, one in which Clinton railed against Trump for his "rigged" election talk and another where Trump (falsely) criticized Clinton for losing $6 billion at the State Department. Luntz, certainly, and many of his focus group participants did not like their options. One black woman said no president has done anything for her community since the 1970s, "so when I go to vote, I'm going to vote for the lesser of the two evils, the menopausal one." A man added: "It's very difficult for me because I'm picking the lesser of two evils, which I think Hillary Clinton is. I want to pick Donald Trump so badly it's ridiculous, but I just don't feel like I can, because I think he's crazy."
Luntz's group said Trump won the debate, 14-12, but snap polls by CNN and YouGov had Clinton winning the showdown by at least a 10-point margin.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Violent videos of Charlie Kirk’s death are renewing debate over online censorshipTalking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
What led to Poland invoking NATO’s Article 4 and where could it lead?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION After a Russian drone blitz, Warsaw’s rare move to invoke the important NATO statute has potentially moved Europe closer to continent-wide warfare
-
Africa could become the next frontier for space programsThe Explainer China and the US are both working on space applications for Africa
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to TrumpSpeed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raidsSpeed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raidSpeed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearingSpeed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mountSpeed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own listspeed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battleSpeed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
