On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement opposing a bipartisan immigration deal hammered out by senators Wednesday evening. The deal, which would carve out money for border security and create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children, was co-sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — who took issue with the DHS's public opposition.
The DHS is "acting like a political organization intent on poisoning the well" with their rhetoric, Graham said in his own statement. He added that the agency seemed "intent on acting less like a partner and more like an adversary" when it comes to striking a bipartisan immigration deal, and he said that President Trump had been let down by DHS staffers who had "politicized" the agency.
In their statement, the DHS had said that the bipartisan bill "ignores the lesson of 9/11 and significantly increases the risk of crime and terrorism." The statement also asserted that the proposal would "effectively make the [U.S.] a Sanctuary Nation where ignoring the rule of law is encouraged."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump instead favors an immigration bill proposed by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), which goes beyond the bipartisan deal by reducing legal immigration and ending the visa lottery. The bill has virtually no chance to pass the Senate, however. When asked Wednesday about the possibility of Trump specifically opposing the bipartisan deal, Graham said, "Then we won't go very far."
Read his full statement below. Kelly O'Meara Morales
-
Fannie Flagg’s 6 favorite books that sparked her imaginationFeature The author recommends works by Johanna Spyri, John Steinbeck, and more
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Patrick Hemingway: The Hemingway son who tended to his father’s legacyFeature He was comfortable in the shadow of his famous father, Ernest Hemingway
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to TrumpSpeed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raidsSpeed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raidSpeed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearingSpeed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mountSpeed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own listspeed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battleSpeed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
