An ad-libbed line about immigration was among the most noteworthy moments of President Trump's State of the Union. But does it actually mean anything?
Trump said Tuesday night, "I want people to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally." Journalists immediately noted that he added the "largest numbers ever" bit, as the line as written for him was, "I want people to come into our country, but they have to come in legally."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So what should we make of this ad-lib? The Atlantic's Reihan Salam speculates that it could be "a sign of things to come," including the possibility of Trump striking a truly bipartisan immigration deal with Democrats and potentially expanding H-1B visas.
On the other hand, it could very well be that the ad-lib is fairly meaningless. Bloomberg's Ramesh Ponnuru writes that Trump probably is not committed to either cutting or increasing legal immigration because he "says things serially without caring whether they cohere." So this, Ponnuru suggests, could just be an example of Trump making a remark because it sounds nice and bipartisan, but it doesn't mean he has any intention of following through.
Another interpretation is that Trump simply didn't think about what it means at all and just likes to brag about things being bigger than ever before. Axios' Jonathan Swan writes, "My best guess, having covered Trump a little while, is the 'largest numbers ever' addition means nothing. He just likes the sound of hyperbole."
-
5 artfully drawn cartoons about Donald Trump's Epstein doodleCartoons Artists take on a mountainous legacy, creepy art, and more
-
Violent videos of Charlie Kirk’s death are renewing debate over online censorshipTalking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
What led to Poland invoking NATO’s Article 4 and where could it lead?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION After a Russian drone blitz, Warsaw’s rare move to invoke the important NATO statute has potentially moved Europe closer to continent-wide warfare
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to TrumpSpeed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raidsSpeed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raidSpeed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearingSpeed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mountSpeed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own listspeed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battleSpeed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
