After Attorney General William Barr's letter to Congress, in which he laid out a brief summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's multi-year investigation into whether the Trump presidential campaign colluded with Russian election interference in 2016, said that Mueller found no evidence of collusion, the White House has considered the results a major political and legal victory.
And now President Trump and his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr. both want The Washington Post and The New York Times stripped of their Pulitzer Prizes that the news outlets won for reporting on national security matters — including on possible collusion with Moscow.
Of course, they do, in fact, award Pulitzer Prizes for fiction. But there is already pushback on the idea the reporting done by the Post and the Times was unduly or prematurely given the award now that Barr's letter seems to indicate there is no hard evidence tying any other majors White House sphere to crimes.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
MSNBC's David Gura explained, by reading the Pulitzer's own citation, that the papers did not actually win the award directly for their reporting on collusion. Instead, the reporting was more broadly focused on Russian election interference, though there were stories about the Trump campaign's connections to Moscow. Gura pointed out, among other things, how the reporting informed the public about former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn's conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak in 2016 that eventually led to his sentencing. Watch the clip below. Tim O'Donnell
-
Rebrands: Bringing back the War DepartmentFeature Trump revives the Department of Defense’s former name
-
Supreme Court: Will it allow Trump’s tariffs?Feature Justices fast-track Trump’s appeal to see if his sweeping tariffs are unconstitutional
-
Democrats’ strategy to woo voters for 2026: religionThe Explainer Politicians like Rob Sand and James Talarico have made a name for themselves pushing their faith
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to TrumpSpeed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raidsSpeed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raidSpeed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearingSpeed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mountSpeed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own listspeed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battleSpeed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
