Why some lawmakers don't support Supreme Court term limits, even if their voters do
The idea of imposing term limits on Supreme Court justices is quite popular among the electorate — yet that support "isn't catching on among elected officials on Capitol Hill who would be the starting point on any alterations to the makeup of the Supreme Court," reports The Washington Post.
Reasons vary. For some, especially Democrats who have endorsed structural changes to the court, adding term limits would take too long, because it would involve an amendment to the Constitution. Expanding the court via statute is, "a far simpler process than passing an amendment," writes the Post, and would have similar effects.
"It takes years to work through the state legislatures," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who is in favor of court expansion, told the Post. "We don't have years when the Supreme Court is gutting voting rights, gutting union rights, gutting the equal protection clause and signaling that it's going to overturn Roe."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
For reluctant Republican officials, legal changes to the court seem like part of "a broader effort from Democrats to politicize the judiciary," writes the Post. "I think the system has worked well. I don't see a need to change it," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). "The reason they're talking about changing it is because, you know, Democrats lost elections, which have consequences."
In general, those in favor of limiting justices' tenures, often to an 18-year term, believe it would ensure the court reflects election outcomes over time and allow for more predictable appointments, while opponents think it would harm justices' ability to remain independent. The U.S. is the world's only major democracy without either a mandatory retirement age or a term limit for those who serve on its highest court.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Proposed Trump-Putin talks in Budapest on holdSpeed Read Trump apparently has no concrete plans to meet with Putin for Ukraine peace talks
-
Bolivia elects centrist over far-right presidential rivalSpeed Read Relative political unknown Rodrigo Paz, a centrist senator, was elected president
-
Madagascar president in hiding, refuses to resignSpeed Read Andry Rajoelina fled the country amid Gen Z protests and unrest
-
Sanae Takaichi: Japan’s Iron Lady set to be the country’s first woman prime ministerIn the Spotlight Takaichi is a member of Japan’s conservative, nationalist Liberal Democratic Party
-
Israel, Hamas agree to first step of Trump peace planSpeed Read Israel’s military pulls back in Gaza amid prisoner exchange
-
Israel intercepts 2nd Gaza aid flotilla in a weekSpeed Read The Israeli military intercepted a flotilla of nine boats with 145 activists aboard along with medical and food aid
-
Japan poised to get first woman prime ministerSpeed Read The ruling Liberal Democratic Party elected former Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi
-
Israel and Hamas meet on hostages, Trump’s planSpeed Read Hamas accepted the general terms of Trump’s 20-point plan, including the release of all remaining hostages



