Free to call a police horse gay: Section 5 reformed at last
Removal of controversial 'insult' clause from Public Order Act is a victory for campaigners
THE BRITISH public will soon be free to call a police horse gay, insult Scientology or growl at a dog without fear of prosecution, after Home Secretary Theresa May announced a fundamental change to the Public Order Act.
Section 5 of the act allowed the police and courts to determine what is insulting. It will now be amended in what campaigners have called a victory for free speech, The Guardian reports.
The act, which covers both the spoken and written word, will be altered so that a person can only be found guilty of an offence if they use threatening or abusive words or behaviour. No longer will "insulting" words or behaviour be covered.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It comes after a long campaign against the act supported by, among others, human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and Tory MP David Davis.
The Repeal Section 5 campaign notes that an Oxford student, Sam Brown, was arrested under the act after saying to a police officer: "Excuse me, do you realise your horse is gay?"
Teenager Kyle Little was arrested and prosecuted over a "daft little growl" at two dogs, despite their owners not supporting the move. Little's conviction was later appealed at Newcastle Crown Court in a case which cost the taxpayer £8,000.
An unnamed 15-year-old who demonstrated outside the Church of Scientology's London headquarters with a sign calling the religion a "dangerous cult" was arrested and charged in 2008, before the CPS dropped the case.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
May told MPs the government would accept changes to the act suggested by the House of Lords in December after the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer, had assured her "that the word 'insulting' could safely be removed without the risk of undermining the ability of the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] to bring prosecutions".
Simon Calvert, Reform Section 5 campaign director, said: "People of all shades of opinion have suffered at the hands of Section 5. By accepting the Lords' amendment to reform it, the government has managed to please the widest possible cross-section of society. They have done the right thing and we congratulate them."
However, lawyer Adam Wagner at the Human Rights Blog asks if the changes go far enough, pointing out the police and courts can still decide if "we have sent grossly offensive messages on Facebook, Twitter and in practically any other communications medium" under section 127 of the 2003 Communications Act.
He points to the prosecutions of Liam Stacey, the student jailed for 56 days after tweeting a racist comment about Fabrice Muamba and, Paul Chambers who was prosecuted for making a joke about blowing up an airport on Twitter, to argue section 127 needs reform in the wake of the changes to Section 5.
-
How space travel changes your brainUnder the Radar Space shifts the position of the brain in the skull, causing orientation problems that could complicate plans to live on the Moon or Mars
-
How Iran protest death tolls have been politicisedIn the Spotlight Regime blames killing of ‘several thousand’ people on foreign actors and uses videos of bodies as ‘psychological warfare’ to scare protesters
-
Departure(s): Julian Barnes’ ‘triumphant’ final book blends fact with fictionThe Week Recommends The Booker prize-winning novelist ponders the ‘struggle to find happiness and accept life’s ending’
-
Can Starmer continue to walk the Trump tightrope?Today's Big Question PM condemns US tariff threat but is less confrontational than some European allies
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Alaa Abd el-Fattah: should Egyptian dissident be stripped of UK citizenship?Today's Big Question Resurfaced social media posts appear to show the democracy activist calling for the killing of Zionists and police
-
Is Keir Starmer being hoodwinked by China?Today's Big Question PM’s attempt to separate politics and security from trade and business is ‘naïve’
-
Nigel Farage’s £9mn windfall: will it smooth his path to power?In Depth The record donation has come amidst rumours of collaboration with the Conservatives and allegations of racism in Farage's school days
-
ECHR: is Europe about to break with convention?Today's Big Question European leaders to look at updating the 75-year-old treaty to help tackle the continent’s migrant wave
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?