Julie Burchill's transgender article didn't breach PCC code
Observer columnist had 'right to be offensive' with column calling transgender people 'screaming mimis'
A COLUMN in The Observer by Julie Burchill that outraged transgender people by referring to them as "screaming mimis" and "bed-wetters in bad wigs" did not breach the editors' code of practice.
The Press Complaints Commission received 800 complaints about the article, which was published in The Observer on 13 January. It triggered a small demonstration outside the paper's London offices and an internal investigation by the readers' editor. The Observer's editor, John Mulholland, concluded the paper had "got it wrong", pulled the piece from the paper's website and issued an apology. But in a decision released today, the PCC says the column did not breach the editors' code even though it contains a clause that forbids "prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability".
"Clearly, the PCC decided that Burchill's column, despite her colourful choice of language, could not be deemed to be prejudicial," wrote Roy Greenslade in The Guardian. "In other words, she had a right to be offensive." Reading between the lines, says Greenslade, it appears that the commission "took the view that it was a matter of taste and therefore lay within the editor's prerogative".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The PCC's finding seems to call into question The Observer's reaction to the publication of the story. An internal investigation found it had broken its own code of practice, which states it "should not casually use words that are likely to offend". The paper's readers' editor said the column had been published due to "a collective failure of editing".
The pressure group Trans Media Watch tweeted it would appeal the PCC's decision.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why Bhutan hopes tourists will put a smile back on its face
Under The Radar The 'kingdom of happiness' is facing economic problems and unprecedented emigration
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
7 beautiful towns to visit in Switzerland during the holidays
The Week Recommends Find bliss in these charming Swiss locales that blend the traditional with the modern
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Werewolf bill
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Nick Cohen, Phillip Schofield and British media’s own #MeToo reckoning
Talking Point Allegations surrounding former Observer columnist and ITV broadcaster have led to questions about the industry’s processes
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
Free app access for The Week’s subscribers during Royal Mail strikes
Speed Read If you have a subscription to The Week magazine you can read the digital edition on your tablet or phone
By The Week Staff Published
-
Comic Relief to end ‘white saviour’ celebrity trips to Africa
Speed Read Charity’s appeal videos described by critics as ‘poverty porn’ and ‘devoid of dignity’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Last updated
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to star in ‘fly-on-the-wall’ Netflix reality show
Speed Read Former minister accuses couple of ‘exploiting’ royal links with big-bucks deal
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Royal officials to ‘scrutinise’ Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s $150m Netflix deal
Speed Read Duke and Duchess of Sussex have inked agreement to produce documentaries and films for the streaming service
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pitch mystery project idea to Hollywood
Speed Read The Sussex royals have been shopping their concept around tinseltown since June
By Aaron Drapkin Published
-
Meghan Markle ‘furious’ over Palace’s failure to defend her ‘against true stories’
Speed Read Legal documents say she felt unprotected by the royal ‘institution’ - but insiders claim press team were powerless
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Ronan Farrow: is Harvey Weinstein’s arch-enemy ‘too good to be true’?
Speed Read Pulitzer-winning #MeToo journalist rejects New York Times columnist’s allegations of ‘shakiness’ in his work
By The Week Staff Last updated