A COLUMN in The Observer by Julie Burchill that outraged transgender people by referring to them as "screaming mimis" and "bed-wetters in bad wigs" did not breach the editors' code of practice.
The Press Complaints Commission received 800 complaints about the article, which was published in The Observer on 13 January. It triggered a small demonstration outside the paper's London offices and an internal investigation by the readers' editor. The Observer's editor, John Mulholland, concluded the paper had "got it wrong", pulled the piece from the paper's website and issued an apology. But in a decision released today, the PCC says the column did not breach the editors' code even though it contains a clause that forbids "prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The PCC's finding seems to call into question The Observer's reaction to the publication of the story. An internal investigation found it had broken its own code of practice, which states it "should not casually use words that are likely to offend". The paper's readers' editor said the column had been published due to "a collective failure of editing".
The pressure group Trans Media Watch tweeted it would appeal the PCC's decision.
-
The NCAA is a 'billion-dollar sports behemoth' that 'should not be a nonprofit'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump picks conservative BLS critic to lead BLSspeed read He has nominated the Heritage Foundation's E.J. Antoni to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics
-
What's a pocket rescission and can Trump use one?The Explainer The White House may try to use an obscure and prohibited trick to halt more spending
-
Nick Cohen, Phillip Schofield and British media’s own #MeToo reckoningTalking Point Allegations surrounding former Observer columnist and ITV broadcaster have led to questions about the industry’s processes
-
Free app access for The Week’s subscribers during Royal Mail strikesSpeed Read If you have a subscription to The Week magazine you can read the digital edition on your tablet or phone
-
Comic Relief to end ‘white saviour’ celebrity trips to AfricaSpeed Read Charity’s appeal videos described by critics as ‘poverty porn’ and ‘devoid of dignity’
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to star in ‘fly-on-the-wall’ Netflix reality showSpeed Read Former minister accuses couple of ‘exploiting’ royal links with big-bucks deal
-
Royal officials to ‘scrutinise’ Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s $150m Netflix deal
Speed Read Duke and Duchess of Sussex have inked agreement to produce documentaries and films for the streaming service
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pitch mystery project idea to HollywoodSpeed Read The Sussex royals have been shopping their concept around tinseltown since June
-
Meghan Markle ‘furious’ over Palace’s failure to defend her ‘against true stories’Speed Read Legal documents say she felt unprotected by the royal ‘institution’ - but insiders claim press team were powerless
-
Ronan Farrow: is Harvey Weinstein’s arch-enemy ‘too good to be true’?Speed Read Pulitzer-winning #MeToo journalist rejects New York Times columnist’s allegations of ‘shakiness’ in his work
