Mitt Romney's landslide Illinois win: 5 takeaways
Rick Santorum has a horrible night in the Land of Lincoln, getting trounced by double digits. Are we back to Mitt the Inevitable?

Mitt Romney "crushed" GOP presidential rival Rick Santorum in Illinois' primary on Tuesday, winning 47 percent of the vote to Santorum's 35 percent and taking home 54 of the state's 69 delegates. Onetime contender Newt Gingrich came in fourth, with 8 percent, behind Ron Paul, with 9 percent. Illinois was considered a must-win state for both Santorum and Romney, and the race was expected to be close as recently as a week ago. What does it mean for Romney, and the GOP presidential race, that the Bostonian won in a landslide? Here, five takeaways:
1. Romney may have reached a "tipping point"
Illinois "was an important pivot moment for Romney," says Maggie Haberman at Politico. You could see him "noticeably more at ease" in his general-election-sounding victory speech, and his confident "conveying of an aura of inevitability" worked much better than his earlier bragging about an inevitable delegate win. Illinois was definitely "Romney's tipping point," says Gary Younge in Britain's The Guardian. In this race, notching a "double-digit victory in a big state where he does not have a house, did not grow up, and where all the candidates were participating" counts as a potentially narrative-changing win.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. His cash advantage is paying off big time
"Romney and his allies outspent Santorum heavily in Illinois, and it worked," says Politico's Haberman. Romney's 7-to-1 spending advantage — 21-to-1 in the Chicago area — went largely toward negative ads that "ground down the insurgent's favorables," just like they did with Gingrich in Florida. This super PAC–aided ability to "crush his rivals on the airwaves" is Romney's trump card, and he's already playing it again in Wisconsin and Maryland. Campaign finance isn't very sexy, but "super PACs have been one of the biggest stories of the 2012 cycle, and Tuesday night was no exception."
3. Romney is finally finding his voice
On Tuesday, "perhaps for the first time, the argument that Romney will be a better candidate for what he's been through didn't sound completely outlandish," says John Cassidy in The New Yorker, at least for the 15 minutes he was giving "his best speech of the campaign." He relentlessly drew contrasts with President Obama, and for once seemed to believe what he was saying. Here, finally, "was the Romney that [Karl] Rove, Fred Malek, Ed Gillespie, and other GOP panjandrums have been pinning their hopes on."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. But the race will slog on
Romney will "extend his already near-determinative delegate lead" with his Illinois blowout, says Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post. But not even his "staunchest allies" think he got what he really needs — true momentum — or landed "the single knockout blow he needs to convincingly end this race." That means "the slog continues," with Romney and Santorum trading wins until at least June.
5. And many Republicans still aren't happy
Romney "may be on the verge of sealing things numerically, but he still has work to do to seal it emotionally," says Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast. Anecdotal evidence and exit polls suggest that the GOP is "in like, but not in love," with Romney, says Roger Simon at Politico. Turnout was low, and "the Illinois contest failed to generate much enthusiasm, even in the state," says Howard Kurtz at The Daily Beast, but that's fine with Romney. Sure, "he generates limited enthusiasm" among Republicans, but he "wins by not losing," and not losing will make him the nominee.
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published