emocrat Terry McAuliffe won Virginia's gubernatorial race on Tuesday, giving Democrats a big victory and breaking the Old Dominion's 36-year streak of handing the statehouse to the party not residing in the White House. McAuliffe beat state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) by a narrow 2.6 percentage points, 48 percent to 45.4 percent. Recent polls had McAuliffe up by an average of 6.7 points.
With almost all the votes counted, we've entered the "What does it mean?" phase of the election. Democrats, breathing a sigh of relief, are calling the victory by the relatively unpopular, Clinton-aligned fundraiser a rejection of the conservative Tea Party wing of the GOP, and the federal government shutdown that faction orchestrated. The exit polls bear that out, to some extent.
Running "a longtime culture warrior" like Cuccinelli didn't work out so well for the GOP, says USA Today in an editorial, rubbing salt in the wound. "A Republican candidate could have, and probably should have, won this year's Virginia governor race against a Democrat with shallow roots in the state, no previous experience in elective office, and a host of unanswered questions about his business dealings."
Some Republicans are framing their narrower-than-expected loss as a repudiation of ObamaCare. That was Cuccinelli's silver lining. "Despite being outspent by an unprecedented $15 million, this race came down to the wire because of ObamaCare," he said in his concession speech. The exit polls also provide some evidence for this story line.
Politico's James Hohmann lays out that case, declaring that "ObamaCare almost killed McAuliffe":
When President Barack Obama crossed the Potomac for McAuliffe Sunday, he glaringly avoided even mentioning his signature accomplishment — trying instead to link Cuccinelli with the federal government shutdown. Exit polls show a majority of voters — 53 percent — opposed the law. Among them, 81 percent voted for Cuccinelli and 8 percent voted for Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis. McAuliffe won overwhelmingly among the 46 percent who support the health-care overhaul. [Politico]
"Cuccinelli called the off-year election a referendum on ObamaCare at every stop during the final days," Hohmann notes. The Wall Street Journal, in an editorial largely critical of Cuccinelli, adds that the attorney general "spent the last week campaigning against ObamaCare's Medicaid expansion in Virginia, and it helped him close what was a double-digit deficit."
Noted political prognosticator Stu Rothenberg agrees, sounding a warning note for Democrats:
Obamacare is a problem. If you are a Dem, you don't like to hear it. But it's an obvious conclusion from surprisingly close VA results.— Stuart Rothenberg (@StuPolitics) November 6, 2013
But as The New Republic's Alec MacGillis points out, the narrowness of the race is probably less important than the final result. And the final result is a net win for ObamaCare:
Spin VA margin all you want. Bottom line for actual people is that Medicaid expansion for 400K Virginians just got more likely.— Alec MacGillis (@AlecMacGillis) November 6, 2013
Cuccinelli's the one who explicitly made this a referendum on ObamaCare, says Josh Barro at Business Insider. Well, "the results are in. Cuccinelli has lost. And ObamaCare, therefore, has won." It may be true that the exit polls show the Affordable Care Act is pretty unpopular in Virginia, with 53 percent opposed, but that "actually makes Republicans' case that ObamaCare is an asset for them more untenable."
Even in an election that the Republican candidate was deeming to be a "referendum on ObamaCare," in a state where ObamaCare is not popular, against a Democratic nominee whose key career accomplishment is unusual success at influence peddling, the Republican nominee lost. What lesson should Republicans take away? One is perhaps that, while the public is wary of ObamaCare, scorched-earth opposition to it is not a winning electoral strategy.... Perhaps they could also consider developing their own alternative health policy agenda so they can have something to put up against ObamaCare in a referendum. [Business Insider]
The ObamaCare rollout debacle probably did hurt McAuliffe and help Cuccinelli in Virginia, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. But the Tea Party favorite was foolish to think that "attacking McAuliffe’s record, running against ObamaCare, and sticking firm on social issues and guns would be enough in an off-year election" in purple Virginia.
Still, Cuccinelli's loss shouldn't "provide much comfort for Dems around the country who will have to run on ObamaCare in 2014," Rubin adds. In fact, "the connection between Dems and ObamaCare may be more potent in the Senate races when those who actually voted for it will be on the ballot."
So ObamaCare will probably be back as a political cudgel in a few short months, as we start the long slog toward the 2014 midterm elections. How effective a weapon it will be probably depends on what happens to the law before then.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- Which states get screwed worst by the Electoral College?
- Attack of the invasive species
- These stunning travel photos remind us that we're all just amateurs with iPhones
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- Why Good Friday is so important to Christians
Subscribe to the Week