Does Arizona's new immigration law go too far?
Arizona's controversial new anti-immigrant measure provoked a warning from the Mexican government. Have state politicians overreached?
After Arizona's new immigration bill was signed into law last Friday, Mexico has warned its own citizens that they may face a "negative political environment" if they venture across the border. The new law requires police to question anyone who they suspect might be an illegal immigrant — and to arrest those who fail to show identity papers. The president has called the new legislation "misguided," but conceded it was provoked by the federal government's failure to act on illegal immigration. Has Arizona gone too far? (Watch an AP report about the furor over Arizona's immigration law)
Arizona had to act: Concerns that this bill is disproportionately harsh "have to be balanced against necessity," says Jonah Goldberg at the LA Times. The "economic, social and environmental" costs of unchecked immigration are too much for Arizona to bear, and something needed to be done. The state is simply enforcing a "federal law that Washington isn't enforcing."
"Arizona's ugly but necessary immigration law"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But it has acted by encouraging racism: Arizona does need to tackle this problem, says Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post. But giving police these powers invites profiling, relegating legal Latino citizens of the state to "second-class status." The bill is "racist, arbitrary, oppressive, mean-spirited [and] unjust." Let's hope the courts find it "unconstitutional" and strike it down.
"Arizona's new immigration law is an act of vengeance"
This is bad for Arizona, but it may make Obama act: Not only is this bill practically unenforceable, says an unsigned editorial in the Arizona State Press, it's "making Arizona a target of ridicule." But at least the federal government is beginning to admit it has failed to address immigration. Let's hope this flawed bill spurs "real action" in Washington.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Nothing will change as long as both parties keep playing politics: Unfortunately, lawmakers are choosing to "play politics" with this situation, says an editorial in The Wall Street Journal, rather than fix it. Obama has decided to "pick a fight and define Republicans as anti-Hispanic going into the election," while the GOP can use the bill to paint the government as weak on border control. Expect even more "desperate laws" to be passed at the state level.
-
The Week Unwrapped: Are British rappers the world’s best?Podcast Plus can the Maldives quit smoking? And can whales lead us to immortality?
-
The week’s best photosIn Pictures A leap through the leaves, a typhoon's aftermath, and more
-
Microsoft pursues digital intelligence ‘aligned to human values’ in shift from OpenAIUNDER THE RADAR The iconic tech giant is jumping into the AI game with a bold new initiative designed to place people first in the search for digital intelligence
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration