What we don’t know can’t hurt us. If ever there was an aphorism that irks journalists and others who are temperamentally driven to know as much as possible, that’s it. We prefer Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis’ observation that “sunlight is the best disinfectant.” So it is with considerable angst that on one of the most crucial government undertakings of these fragile times—the “stress tests” that regulators performed on the nation’s banks—I find myself sympathizing with the camp that’s pushing for less information, not more.
The question is how many details the government should reveal about the results of the tests, which are aimed at determining if the banks will be able to ride out a prolonged recession. The ones deemed especially vulnerable will have to raise more capital and possibly be given additional billions in bailout money. But the concern is that if the public knows too much about how shaky some banks truly are, investors and customers will flee, and the ensuing bank failures could put the entire financial system under unbearable strain. A similar dynamic is playing out in the response to the swine flu outbreak. Of course we need to be informed about the disease and the precautions we should be taking. But constant coverage of every new case that turns up anywhere in the world makes it seem, wrongly, that there’s already a full-blown pandemic. On both issues, government and media must balance a responsibility to inform the public with a sensitivity to the consequences of inducing panic. It cuts against my journalistic grain to say this, but sometimes there is such a thing as too much information.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'Good riddance to the televised presidential debate'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Caitlin Clark the No. 1 pick in bullish WNBA DraftSpeed Read As expected, she went to the Indiana Fever
-
Today's political cartoons - April 16, 2024Cartoons Tuesday's cartoons - sleepyhead, little people, and more
-
Editor's letterfeature
-
Editor's letter: Are college athletes employees?
feature The National Labor Relations Board's decision deeming scholarship players “employees” of Northwestern University has many worrying that college sports itself will soon be history.
-
Editor's letter
feature
-
Editor's letter: When a bot takes your job
feature Now that computers can write news stories, drive cars, and play chess, we’re all in trouble.
-
Editor's letter: Electronic cocoons
feature Smartphones have their upside, but city streets are now full of people walking with their heads down.
-
Editor's letter: The real cause of income inequality
feature When management and stockholders pocket all the profits, the middle class falls further behind.
-
Editor's letter: The real reason you’re so forgetful
feature When you consider how much junk we’ve stored in our brains, it’s no surprise we can’t remember our PINs.
-
Editor's letter: Ostentatious politicians
feature The McDonnells’ indictment for corruption speaks volumes about the company elected officials now keep.