How to predict an election
Don't pay much attention to campaigns. It's the "fundamentals" that count.
Between now and November 2016, reporters and pundits will write tens of thousands of stories about Hillary Clinton and the many Republicans running for president. The candidates' strategies, speeches, debates, gaffes, poll numbers, and (occasionally) policy views will be sifted, dissected, analyzed, and criticized. But what if all that verbiage tells us virtually nothing about who will win?
An influential school of political scientists insists that presidential elections are not determined by what candidates do and say in the campaigns, but by "fundamentals." Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz, who has correctly predicted the popular vote winner in every presidential election since 1988, says that what really counts are a few tectonic factors: Is the economy on the upswing before the election? What's the approval rating of the current occupant of the White House? Are swing voters so unhappy and pessimistic that they're eager to toss out the party in power, or do they feel good enough about the country's direction to stay the course?
The number of voters in play is very small. As Jonathan Chait points out this week at New York, "each party seems to be able to count on the support of at least 45 percent of the voters regardless of what is happening in the world."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That means the two parties and their army of strategists and donors will spend about $5 billion to sway the votes of 10 percent of the population — actually, just 10 percent of voters in a handful of swing states. The pivotal ballots, political scientists say, will be cast mostly by "low-information voters" who don't follow politics closely and rely on vague, gut feelings. Ah, democracy. Inspiring, isn't it?
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Falk is editor-in-chief of The Week, and has held that role since the magazine's first issue in 2001. He has previously been a reporter, columnist, and editor at the Gannett Westchester Newspapers and at Newsday, where he was part of two reporting teams that won Pulitzer Prizes.
-
Solo travel: the 'ultimate indulgence in 2024'
The Week Recommends Why more of us are choosing to go on holiday on our own
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'Stormy Monday for Don'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
6 queer poets to read whenever but especially now
The Week Recommends April is National Poetry Month
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published