Why Paul Ryan will spend the next year talking about policy — but not making any
He's punting until at least 2017. Can you blame him?
House Speaker Paul Ryan, as you will learn in almost any article about him, is a wonk's wonk, so full of wonky wonkiness that never before has Congress seen a leader who cares so deeply about the substance of governing.
So now that he's the new speaker of the House, the real meat of policy work will begin, right? Well... not exactly.
The Wisconsin Republican's plan, as he's described it in the last few days, looks to be not so much about making policy as it is talking about policy. So don't hold your breath for anything meaningful to come out of Ryan's House in the next 14 months — and if a Democrat wins the 2016 presidential race, maybe not for years after.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Ryan has made it clear that he is not interested in working with President Obama on much of anything; instead, he's going to spend his time coming up with an agenda Republicans can present to the public that will convince them to keep the GOP in control of Congress and give it the White House as well.
And indeed, there's a perfectly good reason Congress won't be passing any meaningful bills Obama would be even remotely interested in signing: They just don't agree with him on the substance of almost anything. There may be an exception here or there — for instance, there's some bipartisan support for certain kinds of criminal justice reform — but for the most part, there's an ideological gulf separating the two parties, and since Republicans have accepted that compromise is the same thing as betrayal, there's no common ground on which to meet.
In that context, it's reasonable for Ryan to say that for the next year until the election, Republican lawmakers will spend their time not making laws, but making a case for the laws they'd like to make. That would explain why Ryan is beefing up his communication team, hiring a dozen new staffers to sell Brand Ryan to the media. Here's what he told Fox News Sunday last weekend, explaining why Republicans have spent so much time fighting amongst themselves:
Ryan has this backwards. Republicans have spent years fighting over tactics precisely because they're unified on policy. They all agree that the Affordable Care Act ought to be repealed, but there were some people in the House who thought that the government ought to be shut down in an attempt to achieve that, and some people who thought that was a poor tactical decision. They all agree that government spending ought to be radically curtailed, but some of them thought that defaulting on the government's debt was a good way to get that done, while others thought that was nuts.
As the party has moved to the right and moderates have been purged, the GOP's policy differences have grown smaller and smaller. What differentiates the "establishment" from the insurgents is nothing more than tactics. If Ryan came up with a brand new agenda tomorrow that was so compelling all Republicans were immediately committed to it, they'd still argue about how to get it accomplished. Fortunately for him, the budget President Obama signed into law Monday was a parting gift from John Boehner that took away the insurgents' ability to blackmail the country.
Ryan isn't wrong that Republicans could use some better-developed policy ideas. But the problem with Republican ideas in recent years hasn't been that there isn't a unified party behind them, or that they haven't been sold aggressively enough. It's that the ideas themselves aren't that appealing to most Americans. For instance, Ryan has repeatedly released his own budget, a document that inevitably gets loads of adoring media coverage for its seriousness and substance. The reason nothing ever comes from those budgets is that they're full of things Americans don't want, like brutal cuts to government services and the privatization of Medicare (not to mention the many "magic asterisks" that make the numbers add up).
I'm sure Ryan's squad of press flaks will be working hard over the next year to sell whatever policy ideas he comes up with. And that's fine — the public really should know exactly what both parties want to do. If a Republican wins the White House, Ryan can go hog-wild passing everything he'd like. But if a Democrat wins, he's going to have to come up with a new explanation for why his House won't be accomplishing anything.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
'King's horses take free rein through London'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is pop music now too reliant on gossip?
Talking Point Taylor Swift's new album has prompted a flurry of speculation over who she is referring to in her songs
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Nuclear near-misses
The Explainer From technical glitches to fateful split-second decisions, the world has come to the brink of nuclear war more times than you might think
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published