How the 2016 election is upending party stereotypes about strength
Love her or hate her, Hillary Clinton is one tough lady. And Donald Trump? Well, he hardly exhibits the quiet strength of Gary Cooper...
As we look back on previous elections, we see the same argument repeated over and over: Republicans say their candidate is strong and manly while the Democrat is weak and effeminate. Then Democrats struggle to find a retort, often with awkward results. But this election, and the responses Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton gave to the massacre in Orlando, highlight the fact that "strong" can be a complicated idea.
Republicans usually start a campaign with an advantage on national security issues, irrespective of the individual they nominate. There's a default assumption that they're the party that's more concerned with external threats and more eager to march out to meet them. Only at certain moments, like the depths of the Iraq War, does the public move past that assumption and decide that Democrats are the ones they prefer on that issue.
In ordinary circumstances one might expect that a female Democrat would start with an even greater disadvantage, but Hillary Clinton is not an ordinary candidate. Not only has she long been more hawkish on national security than most in her party, after all this time even her most implacable enemies would grant that she's a pretty tough lady. And when there's a terrorist attack, she knows the notes of seriousness and resolve she's supposed to sound.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And Donald Trump? Here's where it gets complicated. As in so many areas, Trump takes the implied and makes it literal; while other candidates find ways to express their manliness, Trump stood on a debate stage and said "I guarantee you there's no problem" with the size of his penis, after mocking his opponents as small and lacking energy.
And after the Orlando attack, Trump didn't do what most candidates (and presidents) do in that kind of situation: express sadness, pay tribute to the victims, and express hope and resolve that America would prevail. Instead, he gave a belligerent, fear-mongering speech reiterating his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the United States and blaming American Muslims for not knowing what every one of their co-religionists might be planning. Even his fellow Republicans were disappointed, saying that the idea of Trump in the Oval Office during a crisis was not exactly reassuring.
Trump seems to miss what Republicans have actually based their arguments about strength on. While it's true that they almost always want more money spent on the military and express a greater willingness to use force to solve international problems, there's a particular kind of strength they've sought to convey to the public. Its purest expression might be found in this ad, created by an independent group in 2004, which appeared more often on television in that election than any other:
"He's the most powerful man in the world, and all he wants to do is to make sure I'm safe," the girl says. This is the Republican version of strength: immense power harnessed to the service of protecting children and womenfolk. It's the president as Gary Cooper, the cowboy who's skilled in the ways of violence but only uses it reluctantly, to protect innocents when the bad guys give him no choice. And there has never been a president who better understood the potency of cowboy iconography than George W. Bush.
You could argue that that's not how Republican presidents have actually used their strength, but it is the image they work to implant in the public mind. And much of the time, the image-making works. When it doesn't, it's usually because other issues have become more important to voters than concerns about physical security.
But there's real doubt about whether Trump could actually pose as the country's protector, and not just because he skipped out on military service during Vietnam (though I do look forward to the moment when he is forced to explain how he avoided serving through a medical deferment attributed to bone spurs in his foot, a condition so debilitating that he can't actually recall which foot it was). Unlike people who are genuinely strong, Trump is a classic bully, trying to prove his manhood by mocking and victimizing those he views as weaker than him, whether it's women or racial minorities or people with disabilities.
The willingness to use violence is only part of that kind of strength; nearly as important is the idea of courage and calm in the face of danger. Little about Trump gives any reassurance that if he were to face actual danger, to himself or to the country, that he could demonstrate genuine strength (which, it should be said, sometimes can be found in restraint). There's no telling what kind of an impact issues of national security will have on the election in November, but at the moment it doesn't appear that the candidate whose insecurities about his masculinity are on such vivid display will have any advantage on that score.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
'Make legal immigration a more plausible option'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
LA-to-Las Vegas high-speed rail line breaks ground
Speed Read The railway will be ready as soon as 2028
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Israel's military intelligence chief resigns
Speed Read Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva is the first leader to quit for failing to prevent the Hamas attack in October
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published