Sen. Grassley says the estate tax unfairly favors people who waste money on 'booze or women or movies'

The Senate and House versions of the Republican tax overhaul legislation both contain provisions that would double the exemption for the estate tax — to $11 million for the estates of individuals and $22 million for couples — and the House version ends the estate tax entirely after 2024. Iowa's GOP congressional delegation is thrilled with the provision, the Des Moines Register reports, with a typical response being Rep. Steve King's contention that the estate tax "often falls hardest on family-owned farms and small businesses."

That isn't true, the Register notes, citing IRS and Agriculture Department data showing that only a few dozen of the 5,000 Americans who pay the estate tax each year are family farmers or small-business owners, and almost none of them live in Iowa. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, told the Register that regardless of the numbers for farmers, the estate tax is unfair philosophically, targeting savers instead of spenders. "I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing, as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it's on booze or women or movies," he said.

The Senate version of the estate tax changes would cost the U.S. Treasury $83 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, while the House version would cost $150.7 billion — which is a lot of booze, women, and movie tickets.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up