Donald Trump says that the US will recognise Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which was captured from Syria in 1967.
Israel effectively annexed the Golan in 1981 in a move not recognised internationally. Syria has sought to regain the region. Previous White House administrations have regarded Golan Heights as occupied Syrian territory, in line with United Nations security council resolutions.
But in a contentious move that reverses decades of US policy, the US president announced the shift in approach on Twitter. He wrote: “After 52 years it is time for the United States to fully recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which is of critical strategic and security importance to the State of Israel and Regional Stability!”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tweeted his gratitude for Trump’s gesture, writing: “At a time when Iran seeks to use Syria as a platform to destroy Israel, President Trump boldly recognizes Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. Thank you President Trump!”
The Guardian says the “dramatic” move is “likely to bolster [Israeli PM] Benjamin Netanyahu’s hopes to win re-election”, Israeli newspaper Haaretz says Trump’s move “also looks like an American response to the Russian alliance with Iran in Syria”, while The Times points out that Netanyahu and Trump are “old friends” with an acquaintance going back to the mid-1980s.
International opposition to Trump’s move is likely to be strong. Robert Malley, a former Middle East adviser to Barack Obama and now head of the International Crisis Group, described it as “intensely political” and “in disregard of international law”.
Richard Haass, a former senior State Department official who is president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said the policy shift violates UN Security Council resolution 242, “which rules out acquiring territory by war and serves Israel as it says all states have right (to) live in peace”.
In 2017, Trump recognised Jerusalem as Israel's capital and ordered the relocation of the US embassy to the city from Tel Aviv. In a recent state department report, his administration changed its description of the West Bank and Gaza from “occupied territories” to “Israeli-controlled territories”.
-
Syria’s Kurds: abandoned by their US allyTalking Point Ahmed al-Sharaa’s lightning offensive against Syrian Kurdistan belies his promise to respect the country’s ethnic minorities
-
The ‘mad king’: has Trump finally lost it?Talking Point Rambling speeches, wind turbine obsession, and an ‘unhinged’ letter to Norway’s prime minister have caused concern whether the rest of his term is ‘sustainable’
-
5 highly hypocritical cartoons about the Second AmendmentCartoons Artists take on Kyle Rittenhouse, the blame game, and more
-
Syria’s Kurds: abandoned by their US ally
Talking Point Ahmed al-Sharaa’s lightning offensive against Syrian Kurdistan belies his promise to respect the country’s ethnic minorities
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
China’s Xi targets top general in growing purgeSpeed Read Zhang Youxia is being investigated over ‘grave violations’ of the law
-
Ukraine, US and Russia: do rare trilateral talks mean peace is possible?Rush to meet signals potential agreement but scepticism of Russian motives remain
-
Syria’s Islamic State problemIn The Spotlight Fragile security in prison camps leads to escape of IS fighters
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Trump backs off Greenland threats, declares ‘deal’Speed Read Trump and NATO have ‘formed the framework for a future deal,’ the president claimed
-
Iran in flames: will the regime be toppled?In Depth The moral case for removing the ayatollahs is clear, but what a post-regime Iran would look like is anything but
