Workers ‘paid extra’ to attend Trump speech and ordered not to protest
President vents at perceived enemies as poll ratings plummet
Workers at a plant in Pennsylvania where Donald Trump spoke last week were reportedly told they would be paid less than their co-workers if they did not attend, and were instructed not to protest against the president.
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that while attendance was optional, contract workers at the unfinished Pennsylvania Petrochemicals Complex who chose not to stand in the crowd would not qualify for time-and-a-half pay.
Enforcing a “no scan, no pay” policy, a memo from one of the contractors circulated to workers also banned yelling, protesting or “anything viewed as resistance” at Trump’s speech.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
CNN says the presidential visit was an official White House event “not a speech sponsored by the reelection campaign”, although The New York Times says “it was hard to distinguish it from a standard campaign rally”.
In what is likely to form the basis of his 2020 re-election campaign, the president complained about his perceived enemies in the media, the Democrats running for president and the Academy Awards, whilst talking up America’s booming economy.
He also told the audience that they should oust their union leaders if they declined to support him.
However, news that workers were effectively paid to attend and forbidden from voicing opposition will prove embarrassing for the White House - especially, The Independent says, as “Trump has a long history of falsely claiming that liberal demonstrators have been paid to protest”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The president said mass demonstrations that followed his inauguration had been orchestrated by “professional protesters” who had been “incited by the media”, a similar line he used to dismiss protests against the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh and those opposing his anti-Muslim travel ban.
Trump took to his favourite medium, Twitter, on Sunday to vent media coverage of his repeated racism after a series of polls showed his approval ratings had fallen and that he was on track to lose the 2020 election.
A Fox News poll published last week put the president’s disapproval rating at 56%, just one point short of a record proportion and a five-point increase on last month.
In further ominous polling for the president, another Fox News survey found him to be less popular among voters than Democrat presidential candidates Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris.
-
Donald Trump’s squeeze on VenezuelaIn Depth The US president is relying on a ‘drip-drip pressure campaign’ to oust Maduro, tightening measures on oil, drugs and migration
-
Trump appears numerous times in new Epstein batchSpeed Read
-
Danes ‘outraged’ at revived Trump Greenland pushSpeed Read
-
‘Tension has been building inside Heritage for a long time’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
CBS pulls ‘60 Minutes’ report on Trump deporteesSpeed Read An investigation into the deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s notorious prison was scrapped
-
Trump administration posts sliver of Epstein filesSpeed Read Many of the Justice Department documents were heavily redacted, though new photos of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton emerged
-
Is Trump deliberately redacting Epstein files to shield himself?Today’s Big Question Removal of image from publicly released documents prompts accusations of political interference by justice department


